SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16789

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
GURUDAYAL @ BILLU S/O MANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 15155 / 2025



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15155/2025 Gurudayal @ Billu S/o Mansingh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Guvada Police Station Harsura District Kotputli-Bahrod. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Chaturvedi Mr. Rohit Chaturvedi Mr. Saurabh Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

02/12/2025

1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.170/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District-Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 19 and 54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR has been lodged against the present petitioner on the allegation that 48 pouches of illegal liquor were recovered from his possession without any valid permit or licence. Though ten cases are pending against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since 18.09.2025. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Gurudayal @ Billu S/o Mansingh be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Harsora District Kotputli- Behror in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

(iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future.

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/145

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top