2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 16880
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
RAMNIWAS BISHNOI S/O GIRDHARIRAM BISHNOI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 18182 / 2025
[2025:RJ-JP:48134]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18182/2025 Ramniwas Bishnoi S/o Girdhariram Bishnoi, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ram Kuttir, Damboi Khurd, District Nagour At Present Posting Gsss Bhiya Kalan, Block Makarana District Kuchaman-
Didwana.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.
4. The Joint Director Secondary Education, Ajmer.
5. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education)
Nagaur.
6. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education)
Didwana-Kuchaman.
7. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Nagaur.
8. The Chief Block Education Officer, Makrana, Didwana-
Kuchaman.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
26/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed: -
1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, to the respondents may kindly be directed to the petitioner give the all service benefits first appointment.
2. By an appropriate writ, order of direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to any order denying to the seniority and notional benefits to the petitioner on the post of teacher Grade III may kindly be quashed and set aside.
3. BY an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant all notional benefits for the post of Teacher Grade- III, treating them as per with the candidates how had been afforded appointment in the year 1996 and may kindly directed to grant the petitioner notional benefit w.e.f.
year 1996.
4. BY an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefits like seniority, fixation and notional benefits in the pursuance of the first appointment.
5. By an appropriate writ, order of direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the entire benefits including the prevailing interest to the petitioner as per the Hon'ble High Court orders. 6. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
7. Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs.”
2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 06.09.2022 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12480/2022 “Poona Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Poona Ram Vs. State of Rajastha (supra) and Om Prakash & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S..B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21214/2017 decided on 21.11.2017, Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3247/2015 decided on 01.04.2015 and Sumai Bai & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors, 2009 (1) WLC (Raj.) 381 passed by this Court, if applicable upon facts of the case.
4. It is hereby clarified that we have not verified the veracity of the facts as claimed by the petitioner, however a liberty is granted to respondents to ascertain truthfulness of claim/facts made by the petitioner and deny the benefits, if facts are different than as mentioned in aforementioned case.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /127