[2026:RJ-JD:8541]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1345/2026 Ranvijay Singh S/o Arjun Singh Rajput, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Chaugavadi, Police Station Gangrar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Chittorgarh)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1347/2026 Mohammad Jisaan Shekh S/o Shri Zahir Mohammad Shekh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Masjid, Kumbha Nagar, Chittorgarh. (Presently Lodged In District Jail Chittorgarh)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Acharya Mr. Bheru Lal Jat Mr. Rakesh Arora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP Mr. Shree kant Verma for complainant Mr. Brijesh Singh, Dy.SP, P.S. City HQ, Chittorgarh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL

Order

16/02/2026

1. These applications for bail have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS (old Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) in connection with FIR No. 46/2026 dated 18.01.2026, Police Station Sadar Chittorgarh, Chittorgarh, for the offences under Sections

3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 324(2) of the BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and false allegations have been levelled against them. The allegation of firing is against the co-accused Yagvendra @ Sardar Shooter. The injured has sustained four injuries and out of the four, injury Nos.1 to 3 are fire-arm injuries and injury No.4 is simple in nature. There is no allegation of using fire-arm upon the present petitioners. The petitioners are in judicial custody since 18.01.2026 and the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, they deserve to be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose these bail applications and submit that there is serious allegation of using fire-arm upon the injured V.P. Singh and looking to the manner in which injuries have been inflicted at the instance of the father of the complainant, the petitioners may not be enlarged on bail.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of this case and after perusing the case diary so also the fact that principal allegation is upon co-accused Yagvendra @ Sardar Shooter who has inflicted fire-arm injury upon the injured Vishwapratap Singh (VP Singh) and out of the four injuries, three are fire-arm injuries and one injury is simple in nature, in the considered opinion of this Court, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars for an indefinite period as the trial will take sufficiently long time. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that these bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted.

6. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 of BNSS are allowed. It is ordered that petitioners- Ranvijay Singh S/o Arjun Singh Rajput and Mohammad Jisaan Shekh S/o Shri Zahir Mohammad Shekh, shall be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR; provided they execute personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

7. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

(SUNIL BENIWAL),J

33-ajayS/-