HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20730/2025 State Of Rajasthan, Through The Land Holder Tehsildar Bagdaon, District-Udaipur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. Smt. Anju Babel W/o Shri Bharatji Babel, Resident Of

109/7-B, Ashok Nagar, Udaipur.

2. Shri Bharat Babel S/o Shri Harisingh Babel, Resident Of

109/7-B, Ashok Nagar, Udaipur.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Raj Paliwal, Govt. Counsel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saheeram Mundel Mr. Kunal Upadhyay HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

11/02/2026

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers :

"i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned judgment and order dated 31.07.2019 (Annexure-03) passed by the learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer in revision no./LR/8241/2018/Udaipur; M/s Praveen Enterprises Vs State of Rajasthan, may kindly be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside.

ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 01.03.2017 (Annexure-01), passed by the District Collector, Udaipur as well as judgment and order dated 09.10.2018 (Annexure-02), passed by the Land Settlement Officer cum Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur in appeal no.16/2017, may kindly be upheld or confirm.

iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

2. Explaining the facts of the present case, it is stated that the District Collector (Industry), Udaipur vide its order dated 27.11.1982 under Rajasthan Industrial Areas Allotment Rules, 1959 (for short 'Rules of 1959') has allotted land of Araji No.655, ad measuring Rakba 2 Bigha and 10 Biswa (land in question) to M/s. Praveen Enterprises for industrial purpose.

2.1 It is stated that although there was a specific condition in the allotment letter to utilise the land for industrial purpose within a period of two years from the date of allotment, however, the same was not being done by the petitioner hence, notices were issued to the allottee - M/s. Praveen Enterprises.

2.2 Further, upon the application of the allottee, the District Collector, Udaipur vide its order dated 04.04.1989 has granted extension of time for utilisation of the land.

3. It is also stated that on 16.08.2016, an inspection report was prepared by the Tehsildar, Girva stating therein that the land in question is covered by a boundary wall and some marble slabs were found lying in the allotted land. Inspection report also mentions that the conditions incorporated in the allotment letter are not complied with by the allottee.

2.3 On the basis of such report, a notice was issued by the Tehsildar, Girva on 15.09.2016 and after granting opportunity of hearing, the District Collector, Udaipur vide its order dated 01.03.2017 cancelled the allotment made in favour of the respondent M/s Praveen Enterprises.

2.4 Challenging the said order of cancellation of allotment, an appeal was filed before the learned Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur and the said appeal was also rejected vide order dated

09.10.2018.

2.5 The order dated 01.03.2017 so also the judgment dated 09.10.2018 were challenged before the learned Board of Revenue by way of filing the revision petition. The learned Board of Revenue vide its judgment dated 31.07.2019 allowed the said revision petition and quashed and set aside the order dated

01.03.2017 as well as the order dated 09.10.2018.

2.6 Challenging the judgment dated 31.07.2019, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. Arguing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S. R. Paliwal, stated that the order impugned is absolutely erroneous and unjustified and the findings recorded therein are perverse.

3.1 It is stated that violation of conditions of the allotment has resulted in termination of the allotment order, but same was not considered by the learned Board of Revenue.

3.2 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that valuable industrial area has