[2026:RJ-JP:6043]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 230/2025 Hanuman Singh S/o Shri Arjun Singh, R/o Rajputo Ki Dhani, Khudsya Police Station Sadar Gangapur City Through His Wife Bhawna Kanwar W/o Hanuman Singh Age 28 Years Resident Of Rajputo Ki Dhani, Khudsya Police Station Sadar Gangapur City.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General Of Prisons, Directorate Prisons, Ghatgate, Jaipur.

2. District Parole Advisory Committee, Through The District Magistrate, Gangapur City.

3. Superintendent, Central Jail, Sevar Bharatpur.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

Order

09/02/2026

1. Accused-petitioner has filed this Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) challenging the order dated 14.06.2024 seeking first regular parole for a period of 20 days.

2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that parole application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 14.06.2024 on the ground that the Superintendent of Police has given an adverse report against the petitioner. It is further contended that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more six years. His jail conduct as per the report of the justification in rejecting his parole application.

3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the writ petition. It is contended that Superintendent of Police has reported that the case in which the petitioner is undergoing sentence is of serious nature and if he is released on parole, it may adversely affect the society and there will be danger to the petitioner from the complainant side.

4. In counter to the above, counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the report of the Probation Officer is satisfactory.

5. I have considered the contentions advanced by counsel for the parties and perused the material came on record.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than six years; his jail conduct is satisfactory; no documentary evidence in support of adverse police report has been placed on record to deny the prayer for grant of first regular parole, hence in these facts and circumstances as well as the material before us, I deem it proper to allow the present writ petition (parole) and set aside the order/recommendations dated 14.06.2024 qua the present petitioner, thus as per the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules,1958, he is entitled for 20 days’

first regular parole.

7. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly allowed. The order/recommendation of the Parole Advisory Committee dated 14.06.2024 qua the present petitioner is quashed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on first regular parole for a period of 20 days on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of that he shall surrender himself before the concerned Jail Authorities on the completion of the parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility during the aforesaid period.

8. The 20 days’ parole period shall be counted from the date of petitioner’s release from the Jail.

9. In case of his failure to surrender by stipulated date, the Jail Authorities shall proceed against him in accordance with law.

10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bharatpur by fax today itself for necessary compliance.

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu /250