HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
RAMJI LAL JAT S/O PRAKASH JAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 12906 / 2020
[2026:RJ-JP:2827]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12906/2020 Ramji Lal Jat S/o Prakash Jat, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Gokulpur, Post Singor Kalan, Tehsil Khandar, Distt.
Sawaimadhopur (Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, District Sawaimadhopur.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary Mr. Himanshu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. GC with Mr. Shubham Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
13/01/2026
1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred with following prayer:-
In these circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to accept this writ petition and;
the impugned Rejection order dated 22.04.2019 to the humble petitioner on the post of Constable (GD) for the reason that humble petitioner had an FIR No. 312/2015 that was been filed against the humble petitioner U/s. 147, 149, 341, 283, 188, 332, 353 and 427 of the IPC and U/s. 3 of the PDPP act for which there is a criminal case bearing Reg. No. 388/2015 that is still pending against the humble petitioner may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside.
ii) by issuing the writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature thereof respondents may kindly be directed to a) Consider the joining of humble petitioner for the post of Constable (GD) with all consequential benefits in pursuance to advertisement dated 25.05.2018;
iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner.
2. The facts of the case are that pursuant to advertisement dated 25.05.2018 for recruitment on the post of constable, the petitioner has submitted his application form in the OBC category for District Sawai Madhopur. The petitioner successfully passed the written examination and also the PET/PST, and selected on the post of Constable (GD) at Serial Number 87. 3. The petitioner was denied appointment on the post of Constable (GD) on the ground of pendency of a criminal case, and further, on 22.04.2019, an order of rejection was issued against the petitioner. As per the petitioner, FIR No. 312/2015 was registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, Jaipur South, under Sections 147, 149, 341, 283, 188, 323, 353 and 427 IPC, and Section 3 of the PDPP Act, for an incident dated 09.10.2015, wherein after filing of charge-sheet, a Criminal Case No. 388 of
2015 was registered.
4. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the criminal case, arising out of FIR No. 312/2015 PS Ashok Nagar (Jaipur) is withdrawn by the State Government and petitioner was discharged on 06.02.2021 by learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.11, Jaipur Metro. He submits that it is a case of honorable acquittal and petitioner is entitled to be considered for appointment.
5. The petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Avtar Singh v. Union of India (2016) 8 SCC 471, to contend that if a criminal case is trivial in nature, the State authorities are under an obligation to take a lenient view. The petitioner has further placed reliance upon the judgment decided on 14.05.2018 in case of Love Kush Meena Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (SB CWP No. 8323/2017) and further approved in DB Special Appeal Writ No. 373/2019. The petitioner has also placed reliance upon the judgment dated 12.03.2018, in case of Chetan Jeff Vs. State of Raj. And Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10250/2008) decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and further approved in D.B. SAW No. 1479/2018, State of Rajasthan Vs. Chetan Jeff.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance upon the judgment dated 13.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.