SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5356

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANUROOP SINGHI
SANGITA CHOUDHARY D/O HARLAL CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AYURVEDA – Respondent
CW / 19281 / 2023



[2026:RJ-JP:335]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19281/2023 Sangita Choudhary D/o Harlal Choudhary, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Shaid Bhagat Singh Colony, Shiv Bari Road, Bikaner (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus National Institute Of Ayurveda, Through Its Dean (Academic)

Jorawar Singh Gate, Amer Road, Jaipur.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anurag Agarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI

Order

07/01/2026

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-

“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the writ petition be kindly allowed and this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:

(i) By an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, the Respondent be directed to pay the stipend dues to the Petitioner for post graduate course (M.D./M.S.) in Ayurveda for the period 2019 to 2022.

(ii) By an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, set-aside the Order dated 13.11.2019, passed by the Respondent Institute.

(iii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be kindly passed in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Facts emanating from the record are that the petitioner successfully completed her Post-graduate Course, i.e. M.D./M.S. in Ayurveda for the session 2019-22 from the National Institute of Ayurveda (for short “the NIA”), consequent to which, the degree has been awarded to her. Thereafter, the respondent-University has issued the Transfer Certificate, Character Certificate and Conduct Certificate, and even the Provisional Certificate, certifying that the petitioner has passed her examination in October, 2022. The grievance which has compelled the petitioner to approach this Court is qua the non-payment of ‘stipend’ to the petitioner for the Post-graduate Course, i.e. M.D./M.S. in Ayurveda, for the session

2019-22 from the NIA.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal, submits that the petitioner has duly completed the Post- graduation course and has been awarded the degree and is duly entitled to receive the ‘stipend’, and the respondent has no occasion for non-payment of the same. Learned counsel further submits that the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner, being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14160/2019 titled as Sangita Choudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan and others, has already been decided by this Court vide its order dated 29.08.2025, which reads as under:-

“1. Heard on Application (I.A. No. 01/2023) with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, petition is being decided finally. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 21.08.2019, the petitioner initially participated in the counseling process of MD/MS course as in service candidate after and allotment of seat, he has undergone the required studies at National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur and has already completed his course. Thereafter even degree of MD/ MS has also been awarded finally to the petitioner. He submits that in the light of subsequent facts, no more relief is required. However, the petitioner apprehends that the respondents may raise any objection with regard to conducting course without obtaining NOC.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have not disputed the fact that the petitioner has already completed MD/MS course and has already been awarded degree of the aforesaid course.

4. In view of above statements made by learned counsel, it would be in the interest of justice to dispose of the writ petition with the observation that the petitioner shall be entitled to take all the benefits out of his degree of MD/MS.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous in view of above directions.”

4. Learned counsel has further referred to the prospectus issued by the NIA and submits that as per the clause of ‘stipend’, the petitioner being an in-service candidate, is duly entitled

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top