[2026:RJ-JP:6542]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9708/2023

1. Dilshyad Khan S/o Abdul Shakur, Aged About 21 Years, R/

o 34/35 Sector 35, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer Jaipur

2. Vijay Saini S/o Sohan Lal Saini, Aged About 24 Years, R/o

10, Ramnagar-A, Toll Tax, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur

3. Krishna Kumar Sharma S/o Ram Ray Sharma, Aged About

24 Years, R/o S-70 Riico Colony, Sanganer Jaipur

4. Dheeraj Saini S/o Vijay Kumar Saini, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Udb Rakshak, Jagatpura Jaipur

5. Kshitiz Srivastava S/o Manish Srivastava, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 16/34 Vinay Nagar, Bichla, Ajmer

6. Ankit Vaishnav S/o Rajendra Prasad Vaishnav, Aged About

22 Years, R/o Pratap Apartment, Pratap Nagar, Sector 29, Jaipur

7. Avinash Jaiman S/o Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About

21 Years, R/o E-34 Saraswati Nagar, Jaipur

8. Arun Kumar S/o Pappu Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o

44, Mukhya Abadi, Gothari Kishangarh Bans, Alwar

9. Aman Kumar Vashistha S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, R/o Vyas Pada, Masalpur, Karauli ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Jaipur

2. State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jhalana Doongri Jaipur Through Its Director

3. Rajasthan Paramedical Council, Jaipur C-7, Sultan House, 2 And 3 Floor, Above Canara Bank, Sawai Jai Singh Highway Bani Park, Jaipur Through Its Registrar

4. Mahatma Gandhi University Of Medical Sciences And Technology, Sitapura Jaipur Through Its Registrar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman Mr. Keshav Parashar Mr. Moin Khan Mr. Ashish Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini Mr. Vivek Guwalani for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Order

11/02/2026

1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by judgment dated 08.09.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in the batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17418/2016 (Pinki Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.). Petitioner submits that only change is in the year of recruitment.

2. In the aforesaid order dated 08.09.2025 following directions were given:

(i) It is declared that the Rajasthan Para Medical Council had no authority to deny registration to the petitioners and the denial was arbitrary and illegal.

(ii) The respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the posts of Lab Technician/Assistant Radiographer pursuant to advertisement dated 10.10.2016, provided they are otherwise eligible and have secured suitable place in merit, while doing so no objection shall be raised on the ground that their registration with RPMC was not granted prior to last date of submission of application form.

(iii) It is, however, clarified that the above direction shall apply only to those petitioners, who had duly submitted their application for registration with RPMC prior to last date prescribed for submitting application form under the advertisement dated 10.10.2016.

(iv) Petitioners shall be accorded appointment in accordance with their merit position in the selection process. Upon appointment of the eligible and entitled petitioners, they shall be granted notional seniority and notional pay fixation from the date persons lower in merit to them were appointed. However, they shall not be entitled to claim back wages or arrears of salary for the period prior to their actual joining. Necessary compliance shall be made accordingly by the Respondents within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

3. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of in the same terms and with the same directions as given in the case of Pinki Yadav (supra).

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /74