[2025:RJ-JP:47182]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14199/2025

1. Saqib S/o Jamshed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Amruka Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

2. Zuber S/o Dinu, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ranf, Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14480/2025

1. Mubin Son of Mahtab, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Mungska, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

2. Mustak Son of Mahtab, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Mungska, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

3. Sahun Son of Fajru, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Mungska, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain &

Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

21/11/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section

483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No. 499/2025 registered at Police Station Kama District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 3, 5/8 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they are behind the bars since 06.10.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused-

petitioners namely- (i) Saqib S/o Jamshed, (ii) Zuber S/o Dinu, (iii) Mubin Son of Mahtab, (iv) Mustak Son of Mahtab & (v) Sahun Son of Fajru shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J Sudha/104-105