SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 347

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MAL CHAND – Appellant
Versus
SHIV KUMAR and ORS – Respondent


Judgment

23/03/2017

1. Both the appeals arise out of the same judgment and decree dated 8.4.2011 passed by learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Anoopgarh, Headquarter Suratgarh, therefore, they are being decided by this common order.

2. Appeal No.233/2011 has been preferred by defendant appellant Mal Chand and appeal No.143/2011 has been preferred by defendant appellant Anil Kumar to assail the judgment and decree dated 8.4.2011 passed by learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Anoopgarh, Headquarter Suratgarh in Civil Original Suit No.27/08 (54/1995). Learned trial Court has decreed the suit for specific performance of contract to sell dated 20.4.1990 and declared that sale deed executed in respect of shop No.71 situated in Dhan Mandi, Suratgarh by defendant No.1 Shiv Kumar in favour of defendant No.2 Malchand and defendant No.3 Shambhu Dayal on 18.7.1998 and also the sale deed executed further by defendant No.3 Shambhu Dayal in favour of defendant No.4 Anil Kumar on 11.9.1998 shall be null and void as against plaintiff Smt. Poonam Bansal. It was further directed that defendant Shiv Kumar will execute sale deed in respect of said shop No.71 in favour of p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top