[2026:RJ-JP:7734]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2397/2026 Sahanwaz S/o Shri Saikul, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Domraki P.S. Sikri, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Deeg)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amir Aziz For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

18/02/2026

1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.103/2025, registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313, 111(2), &

61(2) B.N.S. and Section 66D of the IT Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner, who is an innocent young boy of around 20 years of age, has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused persons, namely Sameen, Sohil, Saukat and Musahib have already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 07.05.2025, in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 4833/2025 & 5396/2025, respectively and the case of present petitioner also stands on the same footing. He also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since long, no recovery is required to be made from him and investigation & trial will take considerably long time to conclude, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, the benefit of bail under Section 483 B.N.S.S. may be granted to the accused-

petitioner.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that the offence against the petitioner involves serious cyber fraud activities.

4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner and investigation & trial will take considerably long time to conclude, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Sahanwaz S/o Shri Saikul, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

6. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence on 25^th day of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the Trial Court on the same day of every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /63