SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5977

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANAND SHARMA
SMT. NEHA JAIN D/O SHRI RAKESH KUMAR JAIN W/O SHRI RAHUL KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 3144 / 2026



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3144/2026 Smt. Neha Jain D/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Jain W/o Shri Rahul Ku-

mar Jain & Ors.

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan & Ors.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Umesh Chaudhary for Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Order

17/02/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order dated 30.08.2022, after convening the meeting of DPC, the petitioner were promoted on the post of Senior Patwari. Thereafter, they have been discharging his duties as Senior Patwari.

Learned counsel further submits that in compliance of judgment of Coordinate Bench of this court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in S.B. CWP No. 12391/2022 (Rajneesh Labana & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.), Review DPC has been conducted by the respondents and pursuant to such Review DPC vide order dated 03.02.2026, promotions of the petitioners have been cancelled and directions have been given to revert them again on the lower post of Patwari.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioners were not party in S.B. CWP No. 12391/2022 and therefore, before taking any action against the petitioners, they were required to be heard. However, without giving any opportunity of hearing, directions for reversion of the petitioners have been given.

Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners were promoted against the vacancy year 2022-23 and even thereafter, in last two years, promotions have been taking place in respondent-Department. Learned counsel submits that assuming for a moment, the petitioners were not entitled for the vacancy year 2022-23 even then, they could have been simultaneously considered for promotion against the vacancies of very next year. However, without carrying out such exercise and ignoring the fact that, even in the case of Rajneesh Labana & Ors. (supra), no directions for reverting the petitioners have been given, impugned order dated 03.02.2026 has been passed in quite arbitrary man-

ner.

Matter requires consideration.

Issue notices to the respondents.

Mr.Umesh Chaudhary for Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and waives their service.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve two copies of the writ petition in the office of Mr.V.D. Gathala, AGC. His name also be shown in the cause list, as learned counsel for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents shall seek instructions and file reply to the writ petition.

List this matter on 24th March, 2026.

In the meanwhile and till further orders, the petitioners shall be allowed to continue on the post of Senior Patwari.

(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/57

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top