HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MANEESH SHARMA
SMT. RAJRANI W/O SHRI BHUPENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AJIT SINGH SON OF SHRI ONAD SINGH – Respondent
CR / 336 / 2025
[2026:RJ-JP:7224]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 336/2025
1. Smt. Rajrani W/o Shri Bhupendra Singh, R/o 34, Alkapuri-
A, Murlipura, Jaipur.
2. Dr. Bhupendra Singh Yadav S/o Late Shri Shersingh Yadav, R/o 34, Alkapuri-A, Murlipura, Jaipur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. Ajit Singh Son of Shri Onad Singh, Resident of Soldier Farm, Daulatpura, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
2. Raghuveer Singh Son of Shri Onad Singh, Resident of Soldier Farm, Daulatpura, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
3. Vimla Kanwar Wife of Raghuveer Singh, Resident of Soldier Farm, Daulatpura, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
4. Neelam Kanwar Wife of Ajit Singh, Resident of Soldier Farm, Daulatpura, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
5. Renu Kanwar Wife of Shri Bhojraj Singh, Resident of Soldier Farm, Daulatpura, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
6. Santosh Kanwar Wife of Anirudh Singh, Resident of Soldier Farm, Daulatpura, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
7. Smt. Anita W/o Sajjan Singh, R/o Village Sultana, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
8. Tehsidar, Khandar.
9. State of Rajasthan, through District Collector, Sawai Madhopur.
10. Sanjay Singh S/o Late Shri Sumer Singh S/o Ramsingh, R/o Village Shimla, Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu.
11. Deepa D/o Late Shri Sumer Singh S/o Ramsingh, R/o Village Shimla, Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu.
12. Renu D/o Late Shri Sumersingh S/o Shri Ramsingh, R/o Village Shimla, Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu.
13. Sawai Singh S/o Late Shri Ramsingh, R/o Village Shimla, Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu.
14. Rai Singh S/o Late Ramsingh, R/o Village Shimla, Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu.
15. Public Works Department, Through Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Sawai Madhopur.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal with Mr. Anukram Singh Ms. Nisha Rohilla Ms. Deepika For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.K. Moolchandani Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
16/02/2026
1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioners, assailing the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in Civil Suit No.08/2018 titled 'Ajit Singh & Ors. Vs. Smt. Rajrani & Ors.', whereby the application filed by the petitioners-defendants under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of CPC has been rejected.
2. Brief facts of the case giving rise to the present revision petition are that the plaintiff-respondent Nos.1 to 6 filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed, declaration and permanent injunction against the present petitioners, wherein the plaintiff prayed for cancellation of registered sale deed dated 04.01.2005 and 22.08.2005 executed in favour of the petitioner/defendant No.1 and registered sale deed dated 24.05.2006 executed in favour of petitioner/defendant No.2.
3. During pendency of the said civil suit, an application for amendment of plaint has been filed by the plaintiff and the same has been allowed, wherein a new relief for declaring the regularization dated 24.09.1982 in favour of late Shri Ram Singh as null and void has been added.
4. Thereafter, the petitioner herein has filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC dated 22.01.2024 and contended [k] [k that the relief claimed in prayer Clause in para No. 24 ( ) of the plaint is barred by law, as the plaintiff has taken similar remedies before the learned Revenue Court. Therefore, the plaint filed by the plaintiff-respondent may be rejected as per the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11(d) of CPC, being barred by law.
5. The said application was contested by the plaintiff while stating that the present application has been filed merely to delay the disposal of the suit. It has been further submitted that two previous applications filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC have been rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.02.2024 and 10.03.2025. The plaintiff, therefore, prayed for dismissal of the application.
6. After co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.