HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
INDERJEET SINGH,
RAVI CHIRANIA
SHEFALI SHARMA D/O SHRI RAMESH KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT – Respondent
CW / 10027 / 2020
[2026:RJ-JP:6685-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10027/2020 Shefali Sharma D/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 2, Sikar House, Outside Chandpole Gate, Jaipur (Rajasthan)- 302016 ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan High Court, Through Registrar General, Dan-
giyawas Bypass, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342001
2. The Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Dan-
giyawas Bypass, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342001
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, De-
partment Of Law And Legal Affairs, Government Secretar-
iat, Jaipur.
4. Harshit Sharma, (Roll No. 16905) Newly Appointed R.j.s.
Officer Through Registrar General, Rajasthan High Court, Dangiyawas Bypass, Jodhpur Rajasthan - 342001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Samdaria with Mr. Arihant Samdaria Ms. Shefali Sharma, petitioner present in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. V.K. Sharma Mr. Madhav Dadhich Mr. Vishnu Kant Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order
12/02/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ peti-
tion and may kindly call for record if this Hon’ble Court so pleases;
(I) By issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction, this Hon’ble Court may gra- ciously be pleased to appoint a High Level Committee to examine the discrepancies, cuttings and interpolations made by the Examiner, while examining the Answer book of Law Paper -II of the Petitioner in the Recruitment to the Civil Judge Cadre Examination, 2018, which resulted in re- duction of 7 marks to the petitioner in the aforesaid paper; and may also direct the Respondents to revise the result sheet of the petitioner so as to increase her marks in Law Paper- II accordingly.
(ii) By issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to revise and increase the marks of the petitioner in aforesaid Law Paper -II examination from 44.5 to 51.5 and consequently, aggregate marks of en- tire Examination from 147.5 to 154.5 and accordingly she may be selected and ap- pointed on the post of Civil Judge and Judi- cial Magistrate in Civil Judge Cadre pur- suant to aforesaid advertisement dated 15.11.2018 along with all consequential benefits.
(ii) (a)By way of issue of appropriate writ, order or direction thereby order dated 23.12.2020 issued by respondents in re- spect of respondent No. 4 Shri Aditya Sharma may kindly be quashed and set aside and instead of respondent No. 4, the petitioner may kindly be given appointment on the post of Civil Judge Cadre along with all consequential benefits.
Any other appropriate relief, order as may be deemed fit and proper looking to the facts of the case by this Hon’ble Court may also kindly be passed in favour of the hum-
ble petitioner.”
2. Brief facts as reflected from the record are that an advertisement dated 15.11.2018 was issued holding recruitment for the post of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate in Civil Judge Cadre for 197 vacancies in terms of Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 (hereinafter to be referred as the Rules, 2010). Basically there are three stages in the selection process i.e. 1. Preliminary Examination, 2. Main Examination and 3. Interview and thereafter other requirements to be fulfilled as per various orders/circulars issued from time to time. The petitioner applied for the said post pursuant to the advertisement dated 15.11.2018 and appeared in the preliminary examination and being qualified was called for and appeared in the Main Examination and thereafter in the interview. The final result of the examination was declared on 19.11.2019 wherein the cut off for the category of General Candidate to which the petitioner belongs was declared as 153.5 marks and the petitioner secured 147.5 marks and there-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.