2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 6040
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
SATYANARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 18655 / 2023
[2026:RJ-JD:8007]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18655/2023
1. Satyanarayan S/o Late Gopiram, Aged About 64 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.8 A, Rawatsar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
2. Tarachand S/o Late Gopiram, Aged About 72 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Dhigawali, Tehsil Abohar, District Fajilka, Punjab.
3. Ramkumar S/o Late Gopiram, Aged About 61 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Dhigawali, Tehsil Abohar, District Fajilka, Punjab.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Smt. Durga Devi W/o Late Laxminarayan, Aged About 86 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
3. Krishan Lal S/o Late Laxminarayan, Aged About 52 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
4. Smt. Shanti Devi W/o Late Khayaliram, Aged About 71 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
5. Jagdish S/o Late Khayaliram, Aged About 56 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
6. Ramkumar S/o Late Khayaliram, Aged About 51 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
7. Harikesh S/o Late Khayaliram, Aged About 44 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
8. Smt. Sushila Devi W/o Late Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 71 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
9. Vinay Kumar S/o Late Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 51 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
10. Revanatram @ Revanatlal S/o Late Hukamchand, Aged About 70 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
11. Smt. Saroj Devi W/o Late Indar Lal, Aged About 60 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Ward No.12, Sadulshahar, Tehsil Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
12. Smt. Pooja D/o Late Indar Lal W/o Sunil Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Nohar, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Smt. Aarti D/o Late Indar Lal W/o Dipak Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Hanumangarh Tawan, Tehsil/ District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
14. Smt. Jashoda W/o Bhanwar Lal, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Hanumangarh Tawan, Old Post Office Ki Gali, Jandip Agarwal Dharmsala, Hanumangarh Tawan, Tehsil/ District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
15. Bhanwar Lal S/o Kunji Lal, By Caste Mahajan (Maheshwari Soni), Resident Of Hanumangarh Tawan, Old Post Office Ki Gali, Jandip Agarwal Dharmsala, Hanumangarh Tawan, Tehsil/ District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
16. State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur (Adb), Hanumangarh Tawan, Tehsil/ District Hanumangarh Through Branch Manager.
17. Tehsildar (Revenue), Tibbi, Tehsil- Tibbi, District Hanumangarh.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Manoj Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dron Kaushik Mr. Sushil Bishnoi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Judgment
10/02/2026
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 02.03.2016 passed by learned Revenue Appellate Authority (RAA), Hanumangarh, whereby application filed by private respondents under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was allowed and delay in filing appeal against judgment and decree da