SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 6384

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
KALU DAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 4608 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JD:9884]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4608/2026

1. Kalu Das S/o Chhagan Das, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

2. Mool Das S/o Chhagan Das, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

3. Hari Das S/o Chhagan Das, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

4. Jeeya D/o Chhagan Das, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

5. Bhagwati D/o Chhagan Das, Aged About 69 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

6. Pushpa D/o Chhagan Das, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

7. Kishan Das S/o Sher Das, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

8. Birbal Das S/o Sher Das, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

9. Banwari Das S/o Sher Das, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

10. Pawan Das S/o Sher Das, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

11. Devkishan Das S/o Sher Das, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

12. Bajrang Das S/o Sher Das, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

13. Pooja D/o Sher Das, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

14. Kiran D/o Sher Das, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Jimalsar, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Colonization Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Commissioner Colonization, Bikaner.

3. Additional Commissioner Colonization (Administration), Bikaner.

4. Deputy Commissioner (Land Records), Colonization, Bikaner.

5. Assistant Commissioner, Colonization, Bikaner-I Headquarter Kolayat, District Bikaner.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.R. Godara.

Mr. Yaman Rajpurohit.

For Respondent(s) : -

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

24/02/2026

1. By way of filing the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“A/ By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to award the khatedari rights of land in question in favor of the land holders bearing land of khasra no. 170/3/1 measuring 25 Bigha Barani Land situated as revenue village Jaimalsar, Tehsil Gajner (Colonization), District Bikaner.

B/ By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent nos. 2 to 5 may kindly be directed to hold the meeting of allotment committee to decide the application (Annex-8) of the petitioners for khatedari rights of land in question in mode of permanent allotment for the land of khasra no. 170/3/1 measuring 25 Bigha Barani Land situated at Revenue village Jaimalsar, Tehsil Gajner (Colonization)

District Bikaner.

C/ By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent officials may kindly be directed to convene the meeting of allotment committee to decide the claim of the land holders in time bound manner and may kindiy be directed to award khatedari rights of the land in question as per law of the governing field.”

2. After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied if the competent authority of the respondents i.e. respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to consider and decided the petitioners’ case for grant of khatedari rights in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission made at Bar by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top