[2026:RJ-JP:7896]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1908/2026 Rohit Nayak S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bamuliya, Police Station Baran Kotwali, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined in District Jail Baran)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Laxman Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

19/02/2026

1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.404/2025 registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 140(4), 110, 333, 352, 117(2) & 3(5) of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the specific allegation of inflicting injury upon the injured person is attributed to co-accused namely, Yashwant @ Golu Shooter. Learned counsel also submits that out of all the injuries sustained by the injured person, only three injuries are grievous in nature and those are also not on the vital part of the body.

3. Learned counsel further contends that one of the co-accused namely, Pawan @ Chhotya @ Chhotulal has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court. He also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.12.2025; no recovery is required to be made from him, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner into custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.

5. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; the facts that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court, none of the injuries is dangerous to life, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Rohit Nayak S/o Ramprasad, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /14