SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 6675

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
INDERJEET SINGH, RAVI CHIRANIA
RAJENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI ROHITASHAV GURJAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SAW / 612 / 2021



[2026:RJ-JP:5810-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 612/2021 Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Rohitashav Gurjar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Kalata, Post Babai, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).

----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 613/2021 Arjun Lal S/o Shri Gyarsi Lal, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Rajgarh, Via Sardhana, Tehsil Nasirabad, District Ajmer (Rajasthan).

----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 614/2021 Hardeep Singh Choudhary S/o Shri Kishan Lal Choudhary, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Village Kalayanpura, Post Sewa, Tehsil Mouzmabad, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 615/2021 Sunil Kumar Dangi, S/o Shri Ranveer Siwan Dangi, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Narhar, Tehsil - Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).

----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 616/2021 Phool Chand S/o Shri Jayram Prajapat, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Ganesh Nagar, Tekari, Tara Grah Road, Behind Kanak House, Ajmer (Rajasthan)

----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 617/2021 Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Rohitash, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Rajora Post Mandri Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, (Rajasthan). ----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 618/2021 Gopal Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ram Ji Lal Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Rajpura Tehsil Malpura District Tonk (Rajasthan)

----Appellant Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG assisted by Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Sharma, AGC and Mr. Shivam Chauhan, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

Order

Per, Ravi Chirania, J:-

1. These writ petitions are decided by this common order, as the facts and issues involved in these writ petitions are common. For convenience, the facts are taken from Special Appeal Writ No.

612/2021.

2. The present appeals have been filed by the appellants-petitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'petitioners' for short) whereby they have challenged the judgment dated 18.05.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge, by which their writ petitions i.e. S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 5600/2021, 5573/2021, 5576/2021, 5601/2021, 5602/2021, 5603/2021, 5604/2021, 5605/2021, 5606/2021 & 5608/2021 were dismissed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Disciplinary Authority as well as the Appellate Authority have not considered the preliminary report and the other evidence on record, which is sufficient to show that, in the entire incident, none of the petitioners herein were responsible in any manner and further there was no intent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top