[2026:RJ-JD:9269-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 742/2025

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat Jaipur Rajasthan.

2. Director, State Medical And Family Welfare Institute, Zhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur (Raj.)

3. The Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Health Services, Tilak Marg Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

4. Board Of Secondary Education, Ajmer Through Its Secretary ----Appellants Versus Maina Kumari D/o Balbir Singh W/o Rajender Kumar, Aged About

29 Years, Chak 3Y Tehsil And District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

----Respondent Connected With D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 454/2024

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Additional Director (Administration), Medical, Health Services, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. Board Of Secondary Education, Ajmer, Through Its Secretary.

----Appellants Versus Savitri D/o Ram Lal, Aged About 32 Years, Village Bhawandesar Ratangarh District Churu Raj ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Gour Mr. Jitendra Singh Bhanwariya

Order

19/02/2026

1. Learned counsel for both parties candidly submit that the controversy involved in the present case stands covered by the judgment dated 13.01.2026 passed by a Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.278/2023 (The State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Chandra Kalla) along with other connected matters. The operative portion of the order dated 13.01.2026 reads as under :-

“16.Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

17.These appeals filed on behalf of the appellants-State deserve to be allowed for the reasons:- firstly, the learned Single Judge decided all the writ petitions by relying upon the judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ms. Firdos Tarannum (supra). The said matter was challenged by the appellants-State of Rajasthan before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, however, the appeal was dismissed, as the matter relates to appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III (Urdu);secondly the Hon’ble Supreme Court while remanding the matter of Gomi(supra) to the learned Single Judge, where the post in question i.e. Health Worker (Female) was same as involved herein, directed to reconsider the matter on merits specifically on the issue as to whether the Adeeb qualification is a proper qualification for appointment to the post of Health Worker (Female); thirdly in the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are of the considered view that the learned Single Judge has not considered the provisions of the Rules of 1965, as there is no clause providing for equivalence between the Adeeb qualification and the 10^th Standard under the said Rules.18.In view of the above discussion, the appeals are allowed. The order dated 10.02.2022 is set aside. The matters are remanded back to the learned Single Judge for deciding afresh in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajsthan &

Ors. Vs. Gomi (Civil Appeal No.6559/2023).

19. All the pending applications also stand disposed of.

20. A copy of this order be separately placed in each connected file.”

2. Considering the submissions made, the instant appeals are also allowed in the same terms of Chandra Kalla (supra). Accordingly, the orders dated 01.10.2024 and 07.04.2022 are set aside. The matters are remanded back to the learned Single Judge for deciding afresh in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajsthan &

Ors. Vs. Gomi (Civil Appeal No.6559/2023)

3. All pending applications stand disposed of.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

89 & 91-Sudheer/-