##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:6947] (1 of 14) [CW-24743/2025]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24743/2025

1. Prem Kanwar W/o Shankar Singh, Aged About 62 Years,

Resident Of Champavto Ka Bass, Gram Binawas, Tehsil

Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

2. Hanwant Singh Bhati S/o Shankar Singh Bhati, Aged

About 38 Years, Resident Of Champavto Ka Bass, Gram

Binawas, Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

----Petitioners

Versus

1. Smt. Maina Devi D/o Lrs. Late Sh. Tiku Ram, R/o Gram

Binawas, Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

2. Kan Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Gram Binawas, Tehsil

Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

3. Ganpat Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Gram Binawas,

Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

4. Mangal Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Gram Binawas,

Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

5. Mokal Kanwar D/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Gram Binawas,

Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

6. Shyam Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Gram Binawas,

Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

7. Sarpanch, Gram Binawas, Tehsil Bilara, Dist- Jodhpur

(Rajasthan).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Bhaiya.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mrigraj Singh Rathore.

Mr. Kunal Upadhyay.

Mr. Sahee Ram Mundel.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

Reportable

04/02/2026

1. Present writ petition has been preferred for challenging order

dated 11.06.2025 passed by Learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer,

rejecting application of petitioners for impleadment, so also order

dated 08.12.2025 passed by Learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer,

dismissing review petition filed on behalf of petitioners against

order dated 11.06.2025.

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 07:44:05 PM)

(Downloaded on 02/03/2026 at 09:58:56 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6947] (2 of 14) [CW-24743/2025]

2. Stating the background facts, learned counsel for the

petitioners submitted that an appeal was filed by respondent No. 1

- Maina Devi, on 24.07.2020, under Section 75 of the Rajasthan

Land Revenue Act, 1956 (“LR Act”) for challenging mutation entry

dated 06.10.1983 recorded in the name of Shri Bhanwar Singh i.e.

father of respondent Nos. 2 to 6.

2.1 During pendency of the said appeal, Smt. Maina Devi

executed a power of attorney in favour of one Shri Shankar Singh

on 21.06.2021.

2.2 The appeal so preferred on behalf of Smt. Maina Devi was

allowed by Court of Assistant Collector-cum Sub-Divisional Officer,

Bilara, vide order dated 26.10.2021.

2.3 Challenging said order dated 26.10.2021, an appeal was filed

by respondent nos. 2 to 6 under Section 76 of the LR Act before

Court of Divisional Commissioner, Jodhpur and the same was

dismissed vide judgment dated 24.04.2024.

2.4 Said orders dated 26.10.2021 and 24.04.2024 were

challenged by respondent Nos. 2 to 6 before Board of Revenue by

way of filing a revision petition under Section 84 of the LR Act.

2.5 It is stated that during pendency of the said revision petition,

petitioners purchased the property in question and submitted an

application under order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking impleadment as

subsequent purchasers. However, the said application was

dismissed by Board of revenue vide its order dated 11.06.2025.

Thereafter, petitioners preferred a review petition against the said

order, however, the same was also dismissed vide order dated

08.12.2025.

2.6 Hence, the present writ petition.

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 07:44:05 PM)

(Downloaded on 02/03/2026 at 09:58:56 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:6947] (3 of 14) [CW-24743/2025]

3. Questioning the validity of orders dated 11.06.2025 and

08.12.2025, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that learned

Board of Revenue has committed patent illegality by rejecting the

application of petitioners for impleadment, asserting that

subsequent purchasers are necessary and proper parties under

settled position of law. Hence, learned counsel contended,

rejection of application for impleadment is not sustainable in the

eyes of law.

3.1 Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that

learned Board of Revenue has committed an error by not

considering