SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 7287

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Kuldeep Mathur, J
ACHALA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4973/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sunil Purohit
For the Respondents:

The court directed the maintenance of status quo over disputed land during the pendency of reconsideration proceedings following a remand order, to prevent the creation of third-party interests.

Headnote:The matter pertains to the cancellation of a patta issued under the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009. A patta issued in 2012 for land measuring 283.43 square yards was cancelled by the Municipal Council in 2024. Following a revision petition under Section 327 of the Act, the revisional authority remanded the matter for reconsideration and the issuance of a speaking order, though the original cancellation order was not explicitly set aside. The primary issue was whether the status quo should be maintained during the pendency of the reconsideration proceedings to prevent the land from being allotted to a third party. The court observed that it is just and proper to protect the subject matter of the dispute until the final determination by the Municipal Council in accordance with the revisional authority's directions. With the aforesaid directions, the instant writ petition as well as the stay application stand disposed of.

Table of Content
1. background of patta cancellation and subsequent remand for reconsideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. concern regarding third-party allotment during pendency of proceedings. (Para 3)
3. direction to maintain status quo until a speaking order is passed. (Para 4 , 5)

Order

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent–Municipal Council, Barmer, in the year 2012 issued Patta No. 5695 ad-measuring 283.43 square yards, situated at Khasra No. 1706/1, Sindhari Road, Barmer City, in favour of Smt. Dhapu Devi W/o Shri Satyaprakash. It was further submitted that after a lapse of more than 12 years, the Municipal Council, Barmer, on the basis of certain complaints, vide order dated 21.06.2024, cancelled Patta No. 5695 dated 31.12.2012 issued in favour of the petitioners.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that against the order dated 21.06.2024, they preferred a revision petition under Section 327 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009 before respondent No.1 – Director-cum-Special Secretary, Directorate, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur. Respondent No.1, vide order dated 17.12.2025, after hearing the parties, remanded the matter back to the Municipal Council, Barmer, with a direction to reconsider the issue relating to cancellation of Patta No. 5695 dated 31.12.2012 issued in favour of Smt. Dhapu Devi W/o Shri Satyaprakash and to pass a reasoned and speaking order. However, while remanding the matter, the revisional authority, i.e. respondent No.1, did not set aside the impugned order dated 21.06.2024 cancelling the patta.

3. The apprehension expressed by the petitioners is that since the order dated 21.06.2024 cancelling the patta has not been set aside and the matter has been remanded to the Municipal Council, Barmer, the Municipal Council, during the pendency of the reconsideration proceedings, may allot the patta to a third party or alter the nature of the land in question.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to the Municipal Council, Barmer, to maintain status quo with respect to the land in dispute, namely the land situated at Khasra No. 1706/1 ad-measuring 283.43 square yards at Sindhari Road, Barmer City, until the matter is reconsidered and a speaking order is passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Council, Barmer, in conformity with the directions issued by the revisional authority, i.e. respondent No.1– Director-cum-Special Secretary, Directorate, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur, vide order dated 17.12.2025 passed in Revision Petition No. F.53/(3282)MC/DLB/24 titled “Shri Achalaram versus Commissioner, Municipal Council, Barmer & Ors.”

5. With the aforesaid directions, the instant writ petition as well as the stay application stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top