[2026:RJ-JP:7169]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8745/2018

1. Malviya National Institute Of Technology Through Its Director, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.

2. Malviya National Institute Of Technology Through Its Registrar, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.

----Petitioners Versus M.n.i.t. Mess Karmchari Sangh, Jaipur Through General Secretary Gangaram, R/o M.n.i.t. Campus, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.

----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22972/2017 M.n.i.t. Mess Employees Union Jaipur Through General Secretary Ganga Ram, M.n.i.t. Campus, Jawahar Lal Nehry Marg, Jaipur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The Director, M.n.i.t., J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur.

2. The Registrar, Malviya National Institute Of Technology, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarthak Rastogi Mr. Tushar Kumar Mr. Kunal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.N. Mathur, Senior Advocte with Mr. Kunal Kant Rawat, Mr. Abhshek Mewara and Ms. Dhriti Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

13/02/2026 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8745/2018

1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:

It is therefore, most humbly prayed that your lordships may accept and allow this Writ Petition, call for the entire record and by appropriate writ, order or direction quash and set aside the award dated 12.10.2017. If during the pendency of this Writ Petition any amount is paid and if ultimately Writ is allowed then the amount paid should be permitted to be recovered.

2. The facts of the case are that on the basis of award dated

04.09.1997 in I.D. Case No. 32/1998 and reference dated 25.02.1998 passed by Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur, an application under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hereinafter referred as the I.D. Act, was filed by respondent wherein on 12.10.2017 the following order was passed by Labour Court No. 1, Jaipur:

vkns'k gS fd izkFkhZ ,e-,u-vkbZ-Vh- eSl deZpkjh la?k] t;iqj tfj;s egkea=h xaxkjke irk ,e,.uvkbZVh dSEil] tokgj ykyusg: ekxZ] t;iqj }kjk izLrqr ;g izkFkZuk i= fo:) vizkFkhZ la[;k 1& funs'kd ,e-,u-vkbZ-Vh tokgj yky usg: ekxZ] t;iqj rFkk vizkFkhZ l[a ;k 2&jftLVªkj] ekyoh; us'kuy bUlVh;wV vkQ VsDuksyksth] tokgj yky usg: ekxZ] t;iqj] vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj fd;k tkdj] vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku us vokMZ o fof/k ds vuqlkj vokMZ ds ykHkkFkhZ Jfedksa dks cdk;k osru HkRrksa dk lgh izdkj ls x.kuk dj Hkqxrku fd;k x;k] lkfcr ugha gS] vr% ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku] vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;iqj ds izdj.k la[;k vkbZ-Vh- 32@1988 esa ikfjr vokMZ fnukad 04-041997 ds vuqdze esa izkFkZuki= ds lkFk layXu lwph *v* esa of.kZr dze la[;k 1 ls 48 o dze la[;k 89] rFkk dze l[a ;k 90] o 92 yxk;r 95 rd ds e`r Jfedksa ds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k] mDr Jhfedx.k dks ftUgsa foi{kh laLFkku dh lsok esa nks o"kZ ls vf/kd le; iw.kZ gks pqdk gS] foi{kh laLFkku esa izpfyr fu;fer U;wure in dh U;wure osru J`a[kyk dk U;wure osru fnukad 01-01-1997 ls iznku djus grs q nkf;Rok/khu gSa] tks le; le; ij fjokbZt osru J`a[kyk ds vuqlkj e; egxa kbZ HkRrk o lh-lh-,- dh jkf'k] tks le; le; ij ifjofrZr gqbZ] dh rhu ekg esa x.kuk dj mldk Hkqxrku fu;r vof/k esa djsa vU;Fkk cdk;k jkf'k mDr izkFkhz] vkns'k dh fnukad ls lkr izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr ikus ds vf/kdkjh gksaxs rFkk bl izkFkZuki= ds tfj;s vokMZ ls lacaf/kr jsQjsal ls vU;Fkk is'k Jfedksa lwph *v* esa of.kZr dze la[;k 49 ls 88 rd Jfedx.k] vokMZ ds ckn esa HkrhZ gq, Fks ftUgksaus nks lky dk dk;Zdky ckn esa iwjk fd;k] os ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds vkns'kkuqlkj U;wure in dh U;uw re osru J`[a kyk dkuwuh :i ls izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gS vr% bl lca a/k esa vkaf'kd :i ls mudk izkFkZuki= vLohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS vkSj os bl izkFkZuki= ds tfj;s dksbZ jkf'k dEI;wV djk dj vizkFkhZ laLFkku ls ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha ekus tkrs gSaA

3. The petitioners, who are employers, aggrieved from the aforementioned computation under Section 33C(2) of the I.D. Act, have challenged the order on the ground that while computing the be