SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 7656

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
PRINCEPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 2951 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JD:12790]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2951/2026 Princepal S/o Shri Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No 3 Near Gurudwara Suratgarh Police Station Suratgarh City District Sriganganagar (Presently Lodged In Central Jail Sriganganagar)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Jagga, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

17/03/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.15/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Ganganagar District Sriganganagar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 178, 179, 180 and 182(1) of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 18.02.2026. It is also contended that the recovery of fake currency was effected from the other co-accused and no recovery of any fake currency was made from petitioner's possession and the petitioner have been implicated solely on the basis of disclosure statement of the other co-accused. It is further contended that the accused- petitioner is custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-

petitioner may be allowed.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him six cases are registered under various provisions of IPC and SC/ST Act, therefore, the bail application of the accused petitioner may be dismissed.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Princepal S/o Shri Ranjeet Singh, in connection with FIR No.15/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Ganganagar District Sriganganagar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-

petitioner on bail.

7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court.

9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J As

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top