HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
MUKESH KUMAR AGARWAL S/O SHRI RAMMURTI AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8060/2025 Mukesh Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Rammurti Agarwal, aged about 53 years, Resident of Ward No. 1, Agarwal Colony, Seemaram Chowk,Village Sikandara, Tehsil Sikrai, Dausa.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. Prabhudayal S/o Shri Ramjilal, Resident of Near Bavdi, Village Sikandara, Sikrai, Dausa.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rachit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
09/03/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that impugned order dated 03.07.2025 passed by learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge Sikrai, District Dausa in Criminal Appeal No.10/2025 by which condition to deposit 20% of fine amount during the pendency of appeal, is unsustainable in the eye of law. Counsel submits that the petitioner filed an appeal against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 05.06.2025, whereby he was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 138 of the N.I. Act and sentenced to undergo one year of simple imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.