SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 8130

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SUDESH BANSAL, ASHUTOSH KUMAR
SMT. KAUSHALYA D/O JAGDISH – Appellant
Versus
HEERALAL S/O GOVINDA – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JP:9729-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3421/2022 Smt. Kaushalya D/o Jagdish, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kaladiwala (Darogawala) Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar(Raj.).

----Appellant Versus Heeralal S/o Govinda, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Mukerpur, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa(Raj.).

----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Timan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Order

06/03/2026

1. Under challenge is the judgment dated 01.10.2022 passed in Hindu Marriage Petition No.12/2012 (B.T. No.95/2020) by Additional District Judge No.2, Bandikui District Dausa whereby and whereunder marriage solemnized between parties way back in the year 1990 (exact date is not disclosed) has been dissolved and respondent-husband has been directed to pay a lump sum amount of Rs.7 lac to appellant-wife as permanent alimony.

2. We have heard counsel for both parties on appeal so also on application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by and on behalf of appellant-wife.

3. Learned counsel for both parties, having instructions from their respective

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top