SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 8176

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
REKHA BORANA
SMT. HIMANSHI CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
PRASHANT SINGH CHARAN – Respondent
CTA / 306 / 2024



[2026:RJ-JD:11669]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 306/2024 Smt. Himanshi Charan W/o Prashant Singh Charan, Aged About 28 Years, D/o Shri Ratan Singh Charan, R/o Village Paner At Present Residing At F- 216, Azad Nagar, Tehsil And District Bhilwara (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus Prashant Singh Charan S/o Bheem Singh Charan, Paner, Tehsil Sayara, District Udaipur(Raj.)

----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 73/2025 Shikha Tak W/o Rohit Tak, Aged About 37 Years, D/o Satya Narayan Tak, R/o Jhilmil House No. 122, Radhe Nagar, Near Tej Singh Circle, District Bhilwara (Raj)

----Petitioner Versus Rohit Tak S/o Preetam Tak, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gali No 3, Riico Housing Colony, Ajmer Road, District Beawar Presently Residing At 607, 6Th Floor, Elements Mall Near Dcm Market, Ajmer Road, District Jaipur Raj ----Respondent S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 188/2025 Raju Devi W/o Sampat Ram, Aged About 37 Years, D/o Bhajan Lal Resident Of Raniwara Kaba, Police Station Bagra District Jalore.

----Petitioner Versus Sampat Ram S/o Harikishan, Resident Of Ward No. 03, Bajju Khalsa, Tehsil Bajju District Bikaner.

----Respondent S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 244/2025 Dimpal Tanwani Spouse/o Shri Ashok Mandwani, Aged About

33 Years, D/o Late Shri Rajkumar Tanwani, R/o Nh 67, Raj Sarita House, Near Baroda Rajasthan Gramin Bank, Pratapnagar Sindhi Colony, Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus Kamlesh Mandwani S/o Shri Ashok Mandwani, Aged About 31 Years, 1 S Road Khanpur Colony Bhupalpura, Udaipur, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondent S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 265/2025 Smt. Saloni Spouse/o Shri Gaurav Chanal D/o Shri Ashok Kalyana, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 47, Panchmukhi Road, Ward No. 34, Harijan Basti, Bhilwara (Raj.) At Present Residing At 229-A, Ambamata, Harijan Basti, Ward No. 2, Udaipur (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus Shri Gaurav Chanal S/o Shri Raju Harijan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 47, Panchmukhi Road, Ward No. 34, Harijan Basti, Bhilwara (Raj.) ----Respondent S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 298/2025 Smt. Seema Joshi D/o Deendayal Jajra, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Lakshman Nagar, Nimbala Jaw, Mathaniya District Jodhpur, Presently R/o Udasar, Ward No 02, Bikaner (Raj).

----Petitioner Versus Virendra Kumar Joshi S/o Shri Amardutta Joshi, Lakshman Nagar, Nimbla Jaw, Mathaniya, District Jodhpur (Raj.)

(Husband)

----Respondent S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 122/2025 Smt. Krishna Rao Alias Devshri Kanwar W/o Pratyush Singh Rana, Aged About 28 Years, At Present Sukhadiya Nagar Nathdwara District Rajsamand ----Petitioner Versus Pratyush Singh Rana S/o Inder Singh Rana, Aged About 28 Years, Near Bus Stand Chikalwas Loyara Tehsil Badgoan Udaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manas Khatri (in TA No.306/24)

Ms. Shobha Prabhakar (in TA No.73/2025)

Mr. Sarvan Sainee (in TA No.188/2025)

Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur (in TA No.244/2025)

Ms. Shruti Rathi for Mr. Anju Sahlot (in CTA No.265/2025)

Mr. Navneet Singh (in TA No.298/2025)

Ms. Komal R. Verma with Mr. Dilip Vidoya (in TA No.122/2025)

For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

10/02/2026

1. As all these transfer applications arise out of similar circumstances and involve common questions of law, they are being decided by this common order.

2. All the petitions have been preferred by the petitioner–wife seeking transfer of proceedings instituted by the respondent–husband under various provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to the Court within whose jurisdiction the petitioner–wife is presently residing/working.

3. The petitioners in the respective applications have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying that the various proceedings pending before different Courts be transferred to the place of their residence/workplace. Although the factual matrix in each petition varies, the grounds raised by the Petitioner wives are substantially common

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top