SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 8409

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
MUKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 2903 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JD:11636]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2903/2026 Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Mangla Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Siwada, Police Station Chitalwana, District Jalore.

(At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Sanchore)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

10/03/2026 This second application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

The 1st bail application filed on behalf of petitioner i.e. S.B.

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9880/2025 was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 16.10.2025 passed by this Court, with a liberty to file fresh bail application after recording of the statement of Seizure Officer. Statement of Seizure Officer has already been recorded, hence, this second application for bail has been filed.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are false and fabricated. He submits that the petitioner is about 25 years of age and has no concern with the alleged recovery as the contraband was not recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court toward statement of Seizure Officer (PW-1) and submitted that as per the statement of Seizure Officer, the contraband was recovered from the place which does not belong to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the Seizure Officer himself admitted that place in question does not belong to the petitioner and there was no name plate affixed there. The relevant portion of the statement of Seizure Officer reads as under:-

“;g dguk lgh gS fd vfHk;qDr eqds”k dh O;fDrxr ryk”kh ds nkSjku mlds “kjhj ij igus gq, diM+sa o mlds pSrU; dCts ls dksbZ voS/k eknd inkFkZ dh cjkenxh ugha gqbZ FkhA ;g dguk lgh gS fd esjs }kjk ,oa gekjs tkCrs }kjk vkjkis h dks mldh jgoklh k.kh esa eknd inkFkZ fNikrs gq, ugha ns[kk x;kA ;g dguk lgh gS fd edku ds ftl dejsa ls cjkenxh dh xbZ] ml dejs esa eqd”s k ds uke ds crZu] useIysV vkfn ugha feysA ;g dguk lgh gS fd ftl jgoklh ?kj dh ryk”kh yh xbZ] ml ?kj d s lnL;kas dh mifLFkfr ckcr cjkenxh ,oa tCrh ds nkSjku cuk;s x;s nLrkostksa ij muds gLrk{kj ugh gS rFkk mifLFkfr ckcr fdlh O;fDr dk o.kZu ugha gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd ryk”kh ls iwoZ jgoklh k.kh eqds”k dh gkus s ckcr dksbZ tkap ugha dh xbZA ;g dguk lgh gS fd ryk”kh ls iwoZ iVokjh dks ryc dj vfHk;qDr eqd”s k dh k.kh gkus s dh lR;kiu dh fjiksVZ dh QnZ ugha cuk;h FkhA ;g dguk lfg gS fd cjkenxh okyh k.kh vfHk;qDr ds pSrU; dCts o LokfeRo dk gk]s bl ckcr ryk”kh ls iwoZ ,oa ckn eas xzke iapk;r ,oa ljiap dh fjiksVZ ;k fdlh ljdkjh deZpkjh ls fjiksVZ yds j k.kh dh rLnhd ugha dh xbZ] uk gh LokfeRo laca/kh dksbZ nLrkost esjs }kjk izkIr fd;s x;s] vt[kqn dgk fd vkbZvks us ckn esa dh gkxs h rks esjh tkudkjh esa ugha gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd vkjkis h ek= 21 o’kZ dk gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd cjkenxhLFky okyk edku vfHk;qDr ds LokfeRo dk gks ;k mlds fdjk;s dk gks] ,slk dksbZ HkkM+k fpV~Bh fdjk;kukek ;k dkbs Z LokfEkRo laca/kh nLrkost eSaus ugha fy;k FkkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd ftl jgoklh ?kj dh ryk”kh yh xbZ ml jgoklh ?kj esa eqd”s k LFkk;h :i ls ;k vLFkkbZ :i ls fuokl djrk gk]s ml laca/k esa dksbZ lk{; ryk”kh ls iwoZ ,oa eq[kfcj dh lwpuk ds ckn esjs }kjk izkIr ugha fd;k] vt[kqn dgk fd ekSds ij ekSf[kd tkudkjh izkIr dh xbZ Fkh ftl ij eqd”s k vius ifjokj lfgr blh ?kj esa jguk ik;k x;k FkkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd mDRk ekSf[kd tkudkjh fdlls izkIr dh xbZ] bldk dksbZ vda u fdlh QnZ eas ugha gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd eq[kfcj dh lwpuk dk ekSds ij tkus ls igys dkbs Z lR;kiu ugha djok;k x;k FkkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd vfHk;qDr eqd”s k ds fdrus nksLr ;k fdrus ykxs mlls jaft”k j[krs gSa ml laca/k eas Hkh esja }kjk lR;kiu ugha djok;k x;kA ;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top