##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:13540]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1510/2026

Altaf S/o Iqramuddin, Aged About 23 Years, Bhutto Ka Bass, P.S.

Sadar, Bikaner, District Bikaner Raj.

(Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

----Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

23/03/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.103/2025 registered at Police Station Kotgate, District Bikaner for the offence(s) under Section

3/25(1-B) (a) of Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case for the offence punishable under Section 5/25 of the Arms Act. It is contended that recovery of weapon was effected from the other co-accused Irfan. It is alleged against the petitioner that petitioner supplied the said arms to the other co-accused. It is argued that apart from the disclosure statement of the co-accused, there is no reliable evidence available on record indicating or confirming the fact that the petitioner has supplied the said arms to the other co- accused. The petitioner is behind the bars since long and charge-

(Uploaded on 23/03/2026 at 06:29:06 PM)

(Downloaded on 23/03/2026 at 07:48:42 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:13540] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1510/2026] sheet has been submitted before the concerned trial court. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail of

the accused-petitioner application may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 20 cases were registered under various Sections of IPC and Arms Act, therefore, the bail application of the

petitioner deserves dismissal.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the petitioner is behind the bars since long and the charge-sheet has already been submitted, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-

petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Altaf S/o Iqramuddin, in connection with FIR No.103/2025 registered at Police Station Kotgate District Bikaner shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before

releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25^th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned

(Uploaded on 23/03/2026 at 06:29:06 PM)

(Downloaded on 23/03/2026 at 07:48:42 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:13540] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1510/2026] police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the

bail before the concerned Court.

8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the conc