SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 17374

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
AVNEESH JHINGAN
ASHOK KUMAR BAIRWA SON OF SHRI GOPAL LAL – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 9782 / 2019



[2025:RJ-JP:29438]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9782/2019 Ashok Kumar Bairwa Son Of Shri Gopal Lal, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Kamhariya, Post Nagar, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. University Of Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar, J.l.n.

Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. Controller Of Examination, (B.ed. Part-Ii, Examination-

2019) University Of Rajasthan, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)

3. Principal, Shri Kalyan Shikshak Prashikshak Mahavidyalaya Rainwal Manji, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Raj.)

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brahma Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav with Mr. Vishwas Saini Mr. Vishesh Sharma for Dr. Y.C. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Order

01/08/2025

1. This petition was filed seeking directions to the respondents to upload admit card of the petitioner and allow to appear in B.Ed. Part-II examination held in the year 2019.

2. Brief facts are that the petitioner qualified in Pre-Teacher Education Test held in the year 2017 and was alloted Shri Kalyan Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidyalaya Rainwal, Manji, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. The petitioner passed B.Ed. Part-I examination and completed the internship. For the B.Ed. Part-II, the petitioner had to do internship in Govt. UPS Kumhariya, Block Malpura, District Tonk.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has completed internship and provisionally appeared in the examination in B.Ed. Part-II under the interim orders of this Court, the result should be declared and degree be awarded.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that as per the provisions of University of Rajasthan (Ordinance 323) minimum 80% of the attendance is required in all courses and practical but the petitioner had only 4% attendance.

5. The Court in writ jurisdiction shall not sit in appeal over the criteria fixed by the educational institutions for attendance. It is uncontroverted fact that out of two hundred working days the petitioner has attendance of eight days in B.Ed. Part-II course. The mere completion of the internship, in absence of the minimum required attendance, shall not create a vested right for the petitioner for awarding of a B.Ed. degree.

6. Before parting, it would be appropriate to note that in the B.Ed. Part-II, petitioner attended the college for eight days yet was allotted a school for undergoing internship. Petitioner failed to attend the classes designed to equip the candidates with teaching techniques and methodology. The internship program includes teaching experience, therefore once the petitioner failed to attend classes and it was evident to the education department that the petitioner shall not be eligible for appearing in the B.Ed. Part-II exams, sending such candidates for internship is a waste of public money and the time of students in the school where they go for the teaching experience.

7. The petition is disposed of.

8. A copy of this order be sent to the Education Secretary to look into the matter and take necessary steps as required.

(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Riya/40

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top