SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 17595

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
MEWAR UNIVERSITY – Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN NURSING COUNCIL – Respondent
CW / 10158 / 2023



[2025:RJ-JD:36135]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10158/2023 Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar Shri Kaushal K Chandrul Son Of Om Prakash Chandrul, Aged About 47 Years.

----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B 39, Sardar Patel Marg, C Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12257/2023 Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar Shri Kaushal K Chandrul S/o Om Prakash Chandrul, Aged About 46 Years.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

3. Private Physiotherapy, Nursing And Para Medical Institution Society, Branch Office Jodhpur Through Its Secretary, Plot No. 273, Subhash Nagar, Pal Road, Jodhpur Rajasthan.

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12330/2023 Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan Through Its Registrar Kaushal K Chandrul S/o Om Prakash Chandrul, Aged About 46 Years.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

3. Private Physiotherapy, Nursing And Para Medical Institutions Society, Branch Office Jodhpur Through Its Secretary, Plot No. 273, Subhash Nagar, Pal Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12244/2024 Mewar University, Gangrar, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar Shri Kaushal K Chandrul S/o Om Prakash Chandrul, Aged About 47 Years.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

3. Rajasthan Private Nursing Schools And Colleges Federation, Through Its President, 357, Laxmi Nagar, Paota B Raod, Jodhpur, Rajasthan - 342001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Divya Bapna on behalf of Mr. Ankur Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangram Singh Mr. Mitul Jain Mr. Naman Mohnot HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

12/08/2025

1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the controversy involved in these writ petitions has been covered by the judgment dated 02.05.2025 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8760/2025 (Manav Dharma Viklang Sewa Sansthan versus The Rajasthan Nursing Council & Ors.).

2. In view of the joint statement made at bar by learned counsel for the parties, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the cases filed by the petitioner-Institutions for grant of "No Objection Certificate" within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law.

3. The interim orders passed by this Court shall continue till the cases filed by the petitioner-Institutions for grant of "No Objection Certificate" are decided. It is further ordered that if the "No Objection Certificate" is granted to the petitioners-Institutions, then all the benefits accruing therefrom shall be made available to them as per the law.

4. It is made clear that if the State Government passes an order adverse to the interest of the petitioner-Institutions, it shall record reasons for doing so after taking into account the entire material placed before it including the inspection reports.

5. It is also directed that till the State Government decides the cases of the petitioner-Institu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top