SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18495

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, SANDEEP TANEJA
BASANTI LAL LODHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 8047 / 2024



[2025:RJ-JD:40789-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8047/2024

1. Basanti Lal Lodha S/o Shri Pyar Chand, Aged About 69 Years, Ansi Bhawan, Sadar Bazar, Khamnor, Tehsil Khamnor, District Rajsamand (Rajasthan).

2. Shankar Lal Shrimali S/o Shri Ram Chandra, Aged About

45 Years, Village-Debun, Tehsil- Khamnor, District-

Rajsamand (Rajasthan).

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

3. District Collector, Rajsamand (Rajasthan).

4. Chief Medical And Health, Officer (Rajasthan).

5. Block Medical Health Officer, Khamnor, District-

Rajsamand.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shambhoo Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG with Ms. Aditi Sharma, AAAG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

11/09/2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:-

“It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this writ petition in the form of PIL may kindly be allowed with cost and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:-

(i) The respondents may kindly be directed not to shift the Modal CHC situated at headquarter Khamnor to the newly constructed building at Malela which is not sufficient and convenient.

(ii) The respondents may kindly further directed to shift the Primary Health Centre, Malela which is running in one room any other Govt. Building in the newly constructed building in the interest of public at large.

(iii) Any other appropriate relief which deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that it was not a proper site, where the respondents chose to construct the hospital, but at the same time, fairly submits that now the hospital at the site in question has already been constructed and is operational.

3. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, does not wish to dwell any further on the Public Interest Litigation, as the hospital is already open and operational.

3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed.

4. If anything remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents.

(SANDEEP TANEJA), J (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

30-Ravi Khandelwal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top