[2025:RJ-JP:39615]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11758/2025

1. Shadi S/o Mahta, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Nangal, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

2. Kada @ Salman @ Salman Mola S/o Sarfu @ Sarfudeen, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Nangal, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11932/2025 Talim S/o Kurshid, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Tiya Maholla Sahsan, Police Station Jurhera District Deeg Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Mr. Liyakat Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

25/09/2025

1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.137/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 132 and 109(1) of BNS and Sections 3, 5, 8 & 9 of Rajasthan Bovine Animals Act, 1995.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that other similar placed co-accused Sharif and Waris @ Waseem have already been enlarged on bail. The petitioners's case is akin to the other co-accused. It is also contended that the petitioners have been named only on the disclosure statement of the other co-accused and at the time of incident, petitioners were not present at the place of occurrence. The recovery of fire arm was also effected from other co-accused Kamal and not from the petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Shadi S/o Mahta, 2. Kada @ Salman @ Salman Mola S/o Sarfu @ Sarfudeen and 3. Talim S/o Kurshid, in connection with FIR No.137/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/136-137