SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 8739

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SANGEETA SHARMA
DEEPAK ROHILLA @ JADUGAR SAMRAT S/O JAISINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 2321 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JP:10898]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2321/2026 Deepak Rohilla @ Jadugar Samrat S/o Jaisingh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 1496, Jawahar Nagar Ukalani Mandi, P.S. Ukalani, Distt. Hisar (Hariyana) At Present Kirayedar 684-C, Dashmesh Nagar, Nayagaon, Sas Nagar, Mohali, Punjab. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined At Central Jail Jaipur).

----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

Order

16/03/2026

1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 493/2025 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, Jaipur West for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that petitioner is not a beneficiary; he is behind the bars since 12.01.2026; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are six criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 12.01.2026; accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Deepak Rohilla @ Jadugar Samrat S/o Jaisingh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.

7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/78

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top