[2026:RJ-JP:11354]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2412/2026 Vikram S/o Bannaram, Aged 30 Years, R/o Lagriya Ki Dhani, Tan Chirani, Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan.

(Presently confined in District Jail Jhunjhunu).

----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitesh Kumawat, Ms. Prachi Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

Judgment / Order

17/03/2026

1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 8/2026 registered at Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3) of B.N.S., 2023 and 3/25, 6 Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that three other criminal cases were instituted against the accused-petitioner out of which two cases have been disposed of, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that there is one another criminal case is instituted against accused-petitioner, Vikram S/o Bannaram.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and recovery has already been effected. Considering the fact, that three other criminal cases were instituted against the accused-petitioner out of which two cases have been disposed of and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Vikram S/o Bannaram is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during the currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1^st and 15^th day of every month in the concerned police station.

7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/100