SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 8953

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
NAMO NARAYAN MEENA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:12911]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23906/2025 Namo Narayan Meena S/o Shri Ranjeet Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vijay Govindpura, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. The Director General, (Prisons), Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

3. The Inspector General, Jail Range, Udaipur-Kota-Ajmer, Range, District Udaipur (Raj.).

4. The Superintendent Of Central Jail, Ajmer (Raj.).

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheru Lal Jat For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

18/03/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018 (decided on

05.12.2022).

2. In Raghuveer Singh’s case (supra), the Court observed and held as under:-

“38. On bare reading of Rule 14, it is clear that while framing the rules the rule framers were of the opinion that the Gove

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top