SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 9124

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
MANISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 2207 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JD:13172]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2207/2026

1. Manish Kumar S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of 6 Nzpd, Police Station Sameja Kothi, District Sri Ganganagar, Raj.. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Raisinghnagar)

2. Shrichand S/o Bhagwanaram, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of 6 Nzpd, Police Station Sameja Kothi, District Sri Ganganagar, Raj.. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Raisinghnagar)

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Thind For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP Mr. R.S. Gill, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

19/03/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.229/2025 registered at Police Station Sameja Kothi, District Sri Ganganagar for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 333, 191(2), 191(3), 190 & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the main co-accused Bhanwarjit has already been enlarged on bail by the learned trial court vide order dated

11.03.2026 and learned trial court has recorded the findings with the petitioners and complainant party have arrived at a compromise. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long, the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

3. Learned counsel for the complainant concedes that the complainant party have entered into a compromise with the petitioners and other co-accused and if the bail application of the petitioners is allowed, then the complainant party has no objection.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. Heard and perused the material available on record.

6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the impugned order passed by the learned trial court with regard to granting bail to other co- accused, the petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Manish Kumar S/o Om Prakash, 2. Shrichand S/o Bhagwanaram, in connection with FIR No.229/2025 registered at Police Station Sameja Kothi, District Sri Ganganagar shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

10-AnilKC/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top