##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13626]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7607/2025

Rishabhdev Singh Rathore S/o Deependra Rathore, Aged About 19 Years, R/o 41, Choudhary Roduram Nagar, Patrakar Colony,

Mansarovar, District Jaipur (Raj.) 302020.

----Petitioner Versus

1. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Address University Office At Ground Floor, Rusa Building Shiksha Sankul, Jln

Marg, Jaipur (Raj)-302017, Through Its Registrar

2. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Address University Office At Ground Floor, Rusa Building Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur (Raj)-302017, Through Its Controller Of

Examination

3. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Address University Office At Ground Floor, Rusa Building Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur (Raj)-302017, Through Its Dean, Faculty Of

Law

4. St. Wilfred College Of Law, Address Sec-10, Meera Marg, Madhyam Marg, Mansarovar Jaipur-302020, Through Its

Principal ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena with Mr. Divyansh Saini

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Maloo with Mr. Ajeet Singh Rajawat

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

01/04/2026

1. The instant petition is filed with the following prayers:

"1. To re-evaluate Petitioner's internal assessment by awarding the minimum qualifying marks, taking into consideration the fact that no mid-semester test was

held; or

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:26:23 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 08:38:11 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13626] (2 of 4) [CW-7607/2025]

2. To allow to re-appear for Second Semester Internal Assessment in line with the prescribed university scheme

as a fair opportunity to earn internal marks;

3. And to generate a revaluated marksheet for the same academic year.

4. To pass any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the

present case in favor of the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is aged about 19 years, enrolled as a student for integrated five years law programme, at the respondent-College. It is submitted that on account of non-awarding of 30 marks as against the internal marks, petitioner failed in the II Semester. It is further submitted that the scheme of examination was not complied with by respondent No.4, as upon attaining permission the petitioner-student, appeared in the III Semester and was

declared qualified in the examination thereto.

3. It is submitted that during the said period the II Semester result was declared wherein, the petitioner was declared FAIL. It is apprised that with permission of the Court, petitioner had provisionally appeared in the IV Semester qua which the result is awaited. In-between the said period the petitioner has applied for re-examination in II Semester under the category of

‘Ex-Student’, the result of which is also declared.

4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant petition was filed within due time, and the same is pending ever-since the year 2025. The primary grievance of the petitioner-student is that as on date, under the garb of governing scheme, the petitioner is not being permitted to appear in the V Semester examination, which is scheduled to be commence from tomorrow i.e. 02.04.2026. The said non-

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:26:23 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 08:38:11 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13626] (3 of 4) [CW-7607/2025] permission is creating psychological pressure upon the petitioner,

as his entire career is at stake.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents have opposed the prayer made by the petitioner qua grant of provisional permission to appear in the said examination, as his erstwhile application was

filled under the category of ‘ex-student’.

6. Heard.

7. Despite service none has marked presence qua

respondent-College.

8. Taking note of the limited prayer made as on date, and the fact that the present examination shall bear an influence upon the professional career of the petitioner, this Court grants per