##PAGE1##

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5397/2026

Radheshyam Yadav S/o Umrao Prasad Yadav, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village And Post Shuklabas, Tehsil Kotputli, District

Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. District Collector, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan.

3. Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Kotputli, District Kotputli-

Behror, Rajasthan.

4. Tehsildar, Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi with Mr. Jai Khedia

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI

Order

01/04/2026

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

seeking removal of encroachment over Khasra No.896 situated at Village Shuklawas, Tehsil Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, recorded in the name of Mandir Shri Thakurji Virajman, more so in light of the order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure-3) passed by the Tehsildar, Kotputli, Jaipur, in proceedings initiated under Section

91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956.

Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi, learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that a bare perusal of the order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure-3) reveals that a specific finding has been

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 06:08:04 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 08:44:24 PM)

(2 of 3) [CW-5397/2026]

recorded by the Tehsildar, Kotputli, with respect to the encroachment being made over Khasra No.896 and consequently,

directions were issued for removal of the encroachment.

Learned counsel further submits that thereafter, several

representations have been made, however, the encroachment has neither been challenged nor removed till date and continues to exist on the land in question. Thus, learned counsel prays that appropriate directions be issued to the respondents to take all necessary measures to remove the said encroachment and to

ensure compliance with the order dated 17.03.2025.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no

challenge has been made to the order dated 17.03.2025 and the same is still in force and operative as on date. Therefore, there is no justification for the respondents to not comply with the said

order.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the

order dated 28.08.2018 passed at the Principal Seat, Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5393/2018, titled as Rajmata Ji

Sthan Deh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Having perused the order dated 17.03.2025 and the

submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without prejudice to any contrary order that may have been passed by a higher authority in respect of Khasra No.896, the Tehsildar, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, is directed to take all necessary measures to ensure due implementation and compliance of the order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure-3), in letter and spirit, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Respondent No.2 is also directed

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 06:08:04 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 08:44:24 PM)

(3 of 3) [CW-5397/2026]

to ensure that compliance of the directions issued by this Court is

duly effected within the stipulated time frame.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition as well as the

stay application stand disposed of.

(ANUROOP SINGHI),J

VINAY /1

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 06:08:04 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 08:44:24 PM)