SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 9382

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
IRFAN IMRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 3754 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:14570]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3754/2026

Irfan @ Imran S/o Shamsher, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 26, New 37 Nohar, Police Station Nohar, District

Hanumangarh.

(At Present Lodged In District Jail, Hanumangarh)

----Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Gour For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

28/03/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.03/2026 registered at Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh for the offence(s) under

Section 305(d) of the BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long and charge- sheet has already been submitted and further trial of the case may take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the bail

application of the petitioner may kindly be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender

(Uploaded on 28/03/2026 at 05:21:12 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 09:51:29 PM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:14570] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3754/2026] and against him 4 cases were registered under various Acts, therefore, considering the aforesaid fact, the bail application of the

petitioner deserves dismissal.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to

enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Irfan @ Imran S/o Shamsher, in connection with FIR No.03/2026 registered at Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned

SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the

(Uploaded on 28/03/2026 at 05:21:12 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 09:51:29 PM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:14570] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3754/2026] application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the

bail before the concerned Court.

8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned

learned Trial Court.

9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for

its strict compliance.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

32-GKaviya/Simran/-

(Uploaded on 28/03/2026 at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top