##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:14690]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5935/2026

Maninder Singh S/o Shri Kana Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Narsi Nagar, Post Hadiyal, Police Station Tara Nagar,

District Churu Raj.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Department Of Home (Group-Ii), Government Of Rajasthan,

Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Commandant, 10Th Battalion, Rac (I.r.), Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Jhajharia For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

28/03/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this court in the case of Manoj Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3665/2011) decided on 25.04.2011. He further submits that he may be permitted to submit a representation, in light of the aforesaid judgment, before the respondent-authorities and the respondent-authorities be directed to decide his

representation expeditiously.

2. For ready reference, the aforesaid order is reproduced

hereunder :-

“To challenge the judgment dated 28.05.2013, this appeal is preferred. The learned Single Bench by the judgment impugned accepted the writ petition setting aside order dated 28.03.2012 passed by the Inspector General of

(Uploaded on 30/03/2026 at 02:34:10 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 10:23:56 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:14690] (2 of 4) [CW-5935/2026]

Police (Personnel), Jaipur deferring grant of third selection grade to the respondent-petitioner.

Factual matrix necessary to be noticed for adjudication of this appeal is that the respondent- petitioner entered in the services of the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Police being appointed as Sub Inspector on 24.03.1984. Under the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989, the respondent- petitioner is having avenue of promotion to the post of Inspector. He is having further avenue for promotion as Deputy Superintending of Police and Additional Superintendent of Police under the Rajasthan Police Service Rules. The Government of Rajasthan with a view to remove stagnation in service and in lieu of promotion, introduced a policy for grant of selection grades on completion of 9, 18 & 27 years of service. Under the notification aforesaid, it was made clear that the criteria for grant of selection grade shall be the same as applicable for grant of promotion under the applicable

service rules.

The appellants allowed first selection grade to the respondent-petitioner as per the notification dated 25.01.1992 on completion of 9 years of service, however, second selection grade was deferred for a period of five years as during that block of period, he suffered minor penalty of censure on five occasions. The second selection grade was ultimately awarded to him under an order dated 6.2.2008 w.e.f. 24.03.2007. The respondent completed 27 years of service on 24.03.2011 but third selection grade was not given to him in the light of the memo dated 31.12.2009 issued by the department of Finance, Government of Rajasthan mentioning therein that if a financial up-gradation under the Annual Career Progression Scheme is deferred and not allowed due to the reason of employee being unfit or due to departmental proceedings etc. this would have consequential effect on the subsequent financial up-gradation which would also

(Uploaded on 30/03/2026 at 02:34:10 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 10:23:56 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:14690] (3 of 4) [CW-5935/2026]

get deferred to this extent of delay in grant of previous financial up-gradation.

The respondent- government employee being aggrieved by non grant of third selection grade with effect from 24.03.2011 preferred a petition for writ that came to be accepted by the judgment impugned dated 28.05.2013. The learned Single Bench held that penalty of censure is a minor penalty and that could not have been a ground for denying