##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:12945]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5396/2026

Smt. Indubala Singh W/o Sh. Narpat Dan, R/o Maa Hinglaj Nagar

Vistar, Lalarpura, Gandhi Path West, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302021 ----Petitioner

Versus

1. The Registrar Of Trademark (Govt. Of India), Near Chanakyapuri Over Bridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.)

......Respondent No.1

2. M/s Hira Enterprises, Having Its Registered Office At- 37-

A, Rajaspura Peth, Satara-415002, Maharashtra, India.

Through Its Director / Representative.

----Respondent No.2

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta Mr. Mohit Sharma

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

27/03/2026

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer to issue directions to the respondents to proceed with and dispose the petitioner's application No.6119811 dated

21.09.2023 for registration of the trademark.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application for registration of trademark was submitted by the petitioner on 21.09.2023 under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act,1999. The respondent-Registering Authority has failed to dispose the applications submitted by the petitioner even after

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:10:29 AM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:16:04 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:12945] (2 of 3) [CW-5396/2026] passing of more than two and a half years. Counsel has also made reference of the order dated 07.08.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18998/2022 Mrs. Nirmala Kabra V/s The Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr., wherein the Coordinate

Bench vide Para 9 has observed as under:-

" Excessive delays in resolving the applications seeking registration of Trademark indeed undermines the very purpose of filing such applications. When the matter is unnecessarily prolonged, it can lead to a number of negative consequences, including the loss of evidence and increased costs along with a sense of

injustice to the parties involved. "

3. Heard and considered the submissions made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Taking into consideration the material facts of this case that the application for registration of the trademark pending for last more than two and a half years and so also the observations of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Mrs. Nirmala Kabra (Supra), this Court feels that the ends of justice would meet if the directions are issued to the respondent-authorities to proceed with and decide the application submitted by the

petitioner for registration of trademark at the earliest.

5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of.

6. The respondent-Registrar of Trademark is directed to proceed with and decide the application submitted by the petitioner for registration of the trademark, as early as possible

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:10:29 AM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:16:04 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:12945] (3 of 3) [CW-5396/2026] and preferably within a period of two months’ from the date of

submitting the certified copy of this order.

7. The stay application and pending application(s), if any,

also stand disposed of.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /22

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:10:29 AM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:16:04 PM)