##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13016]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)

No. 1077/2025 In

S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1209/2025 Ramveer S/o Mansingh, R/o Gram Narayan Chouth Police Station

Kho District Bharatpur ----Appellant

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

2. Victim, R/o ----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP

Mr. Jahangir Alam with Mr. Tulshi Saini

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

27/03/2026

Instant application for suspension of sentence has been

preferred on behalf of the applicant-appellant under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. alongwith the appeal, to suspend the sentence awarded by the Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.) vide its judgment dated 01.03.2025 in Sessions Case No.87/2015, whereby the applicant- appellant was convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo maximum period of twenty years rigorous imprisonment

with fine.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-appellant

submits that the applicant was on bail during trial and he is behind

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:41:02 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:18:25 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13016] (2 of 3) [SOSA-1077/2025] the bars from last more then one year. Counsel further submits that there is no evidence to substantiate the allegation of rape against the appellant, Ramveer and the principal evidence pertaining to the alleged offence, in fact, implicates Satypal rather than the present appellant. Counsel further submits that there are contradictions in the statements of the witnesses and the learned Trial Court has not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case holistically and the hearing of the appeal will take its own time, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellant may

be suspended during the pendency of the appeal.

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the

respondent No.2 have vehemently opposed the submissions made

herein-above.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material made available on record.

Taking into consideration the conviction, term of sentence,

custody period, evidence adduced during trial & the submissions made at bar and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellant during the pendency of the

appeal.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is

allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the execution of sentence awarded to accused-applicant, namely Ramveer S/o Mansingh, by the learned Trial Court shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:41:02 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:18:25 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13016] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1077/2025] each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 27.04.2026

and thereafter, as and when he is called upon to do so.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

SAURABH /40

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:41:02 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:18:25 PM)