##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:12662]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1630/2026

1. Sohil Khan Son Of Shri Ruddar Khan, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Kajota, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar ( Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail

Alwar)

2. Aajib Khan Son Of Shri Jumma Khan, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Kajota, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In

Central Jail Alwar)

----Petitioners Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2128/2026 Sharoop Khan S/o Shri Sammu Khan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kajota, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar. (At Present In

Central Jail, Alwar)

----Petitioner Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal with Ms. Swati Sharma

Mr. Gajendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP

Mr. Neki Ram, Inspector Laxmangarh, Alwar

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

25/03/2026

1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicants. The

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 03:59:44 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:52:18 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:12662] (2 of 6) [CRLMB-1630/2026] accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 17/2026 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 66D, 66 C of the IT Act, 2000 and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Section Section 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66D, 66 C of the

IT Act, 2000 dismissed the bail application before it.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that the applicants are young persons, aged about 19-20 years. It is submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and that the applicants have been in custody for a period of approximately two and a half months. It is next submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till the disposal of the case.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant

bail application.

4. The Investigating Officer has also marked his presence before the Court and apprised that upon search and recovery, mobile phones and SIM cards were recovered from the possession of the accused persons, some of which were not even registered in their own names. It is further submitted that the bank accounts of the applicants is also reflective of suspicious financial transactions which indicates their active involvement in commission of the said

offences.

5. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, and taking note of the fact that the

(Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 03:59:44 PM)

(Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 11:52:18 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:12662] (3 of 6) [CRLMB-1630/2026] applicants are young persons, aged about 19-20 years; that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; that the applicants have been in custody for a period of approximately two and a half months; that there are no criminal antecedents registerd against the applicants, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

accused-applicant on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sohil Khan S/o Ruddar Khan, Aajib Khan S/o Shri Jumma Khan, Sharoop Khan S/o Shri Sammu Khan shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Judge for their appearance before the court