[2026:RJ-JD:13598]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3000/2026

1. Arvind S/o Sandeep Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, Gaguwala, Ps Muklawa, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar, Raj. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)

2. Naveen Kumar S/o Rubichandra, Aged About 27 Years, 71 N.p. Ps Sameja Kothi, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar, Raj. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)

----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2441/2026 Amandeep Singh S/o Saudagar Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Ravi Chowk Ward No 08 Purani Aabadi Sri Ganganagar District Sri Ganganagar Rajasthan (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Sri Ganganagar)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2757/2026 Kapil Kumar S/o Shivchandra, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 15 Z, P.s. Matili Rathan, District- Shri Ganganagar. At Present Lodged In Central Jail Shri Ganganagar.

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Pareek Mr. D.S. Gharsana Mr. S.R. Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prjapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

23/03/2026

1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.37/2026 registered at Police Station Sadul Sahar, District Ganganagar for the offence(s)

under Sections 3, 25(1-B)(a), 25(6), 7, 25 of Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery of the fire arm along with the cartridges were effected from the other co-accused Shyam Sunder and no recovery has been effected from the petitioners' possession. The petitioners have been named only on the basis of the disclosure statements of the other co-accused. There is no substantive evidence available on record which shows that the petitioners have supplied or were involved in supply of fire arms. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and contends that the petitioners are habitual offenders and against them several cases under various offences were registered, therefore, considering their conduct, their bail applications deserves dismissal.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the fact that the recovery of fire arm and cartridges were effected from the other co-accused Shyam Sunder and apart from the disclosure statement of the co-accused, there is no other substantive evidence available on record indicating petitioners' involvement in the alleged crime. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Arvind S/o Sandeep Kumar, (2) Naveen Kumar S/o Rubichandra, (3) Amandeep Singh S/o Saudagar Singh and (4) Kapil Kumar S/o Shivchandra, in connection with FIR No.37/2026 registered at Police Station Sadul Sahar, District Ganganagar, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when ca