##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13167]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3966/2026

Sonu Koli Son Of Shri Shankarlal, Resident Of Deewanji Ka Bag, Near Footi Khed, Police Station Kotwali, District Alwar (Raj.) (At

Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

---Accused-Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

28/03/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 1117/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Alwar District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 380 of IPC and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 457, 380, 75 of IPC dismissed the bail application

before it.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time to conclude. It is lastly submitted that the

applicant is behind bars since 10.08.2025.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that there

(Uploaded on 02/04/2026 at 10:36:46 AM)

(Downloaded on 02/04/2026 at 09:14:44 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13167] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3966/2026] are 21 criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the applicant and if the applicant is enlarged on bail he will be a threat to the society. The criminal antecedents of the accused-

applicant are reproduced herein below:

Ø- ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- dsl ua- U;k;ky; dk /kkjk,a LVsVl tekur dh vkxkeh la- ua@iqfyl Fkkuk uke fnukad is'kh 1- 281@2012 & & 457,380 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj I.P.C.

2- 798@2013 & & 457,380 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj I.P.C.

3- 112@2014 lqHkk"k & & 2/25, & & &

pkSd] t;iqj 5/25 Arms Act

4- 1229@2016 & & 19/54 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj R.Ex. Act

5- 254@2017 , & & 523,394, & & &

u-bZ-ch- vyoj 324,307, 34 I.P.C.

6- 467@2011 & & 454,380 & & &

f'kokth ikdZ] I.P.C.

vyoj

7- 431@2010 & & 457,380 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj I.P.C.

8- 99@2011 & & 457,380, & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj 436 I.P.C.

9- 102@2011 & & 457,380 & & &

vjkoyh fogkj] I.P.C.

vyoj

10- 31@2000 & & 457,380 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj I.P.C.

11- 624@2008 & & 457,380, & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj 411,401 I.P.C.

12- 591@2008 & & 457,380 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj I.P.C.

13- 42@2009 th- & & 4/25 & & &

vkj-ih- vyoj Arms Act

14- 124@2009 & & 457,380 & & &

dksrokyh] vyoj I.P.C.

15- 369@2009 & & 341,323, & & &

f'kokth ikdZ] 302 I.P.C.

vyoj

(Uploaded on 02/04/2026 at 10:36:46 AM)

(Downloaded on 02/04/2026 at 09:14:44 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13167] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3966/2026]

4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter, as per the averment made by the counsel representing him; that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time to conclude; that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 10.08.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case and taking note of the fact that there are as many as 21 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the applicant is stated to be a threat to the society if he is enlarged on bail and keeping in mind the sacrosanct objective of Indian criminal reformative system and balancing the equity between right of the liberty, strong criminal antecedents and young age of applicant, this Court is inclined to

enlarge the accused-applicant on bail with following conditions:

4.1 That the applicant will go for his employment/work and reside 250 kms away from the place of his current residence for a

(Uploaded on 02/04/2026 at 10:36:46 AM)

(Downloaded on 02/04/2026 at 09:14:44 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13167] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-3966/2026]