SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 9986

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Anand Sharma, J
Sheetal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4257/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, Avinash Choudhary, Anindya Gupta, Harshit Tiwari, Suman Kalal

A candidate who has failed to avail prescribed opportunities for correction of their application form during the recruitment process cannot seek to change their candidate category after the declaration of the exam results, as such a change would impede the integrity of the recruitment process.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment - Category change - Request for change of category from General to OBC Widow after declaration of result - Petitioner failed to utilize opportunities provided under advertisement for correction of online application - Held, category of candidate cannot be allowed to be changed at a subsequent stage - Application dismissed. (Paras 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner participated in a recruitment process for Class-IV employees. Due to errors by a third party, she was filled as a 'General Widow' instead of 'OBC Widow'. Despite receiving an admit card reflecting the incorrect category and having subsequent opportunities to correct her application as stipulated by the recruitment advertisement, the petitioner failed to make the necessary changes until after the results were declared.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the recruitment advertisement provided clear mechanisms for category correction both before and after the examination. The petitioner's failure to utilize these opportunities and her participation in the examination under the General category precluded her from seeking a change post-result.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to modify her category in the online application after the final result declaration when prior opportunities for correction remained unutilized.

Ratio Decidendi: It is a settled legal proposition that a candidate who has participated in a recruitment process under a specific category cannot be allowed to change that category at a belated stage after the declaration of results.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's failure to correct category during the application process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. application of advertisement clauses regarding correction windows. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. prohibition of changing category after exam results are declared. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

Order

1. The above writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the denial of correction in her category in the recruitment process for the post of Class-IV employees.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner participated in the direct recruitment process for the post of Class-IV employee initiated by Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur.

3. It is stated that the petitioner belongs to 'OBC Widow' category. On account of the fact that the petitioner is less educated and has no knowledge with regard to computer or the process of filing the online application form, got her form filled through third person/E-Mitra, who instead of showing the category of petitioner as 'OBC Widow', showed the petitioner as 'General Widow'.

4. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing the application form, the petitioner participated in the written examination and although, she secured more marks than the cut-off marks declared for 'OBC Widow' candidate, yet only on account of human error occurred while submitting the application form, the petitioner was not considered in the category of 'OBC Widow'.

5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after declaration of result, petitioner also submitted application/affidavit seeking correction in her category, yet no action was taken by the respondent-Board. It is also submitted that, in case, the petitioner was treated in the category of 'OBC Widow', then she would have secured proper place in the merit list for further consideration in the recruitment process.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

7. Clause 17 of the advertisement issued by respondent Board is reproduced hereunder:

“17. vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa la'kks/ku dh izfØ;k%& cksMZ }kjk vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa la'kk s/ku gsrq dk sbZ vkWQykbZu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk; sxkA cksMZ }kjk tkjh foKfIr fnukad 14-07-2023 } kjk ;fn fdlh vH;FkhZ dks vius OTR es a Lo; a ds uke] firk ds uke] tUefrfFk ,oa fyax esa ifjorZu djuk gS rks mls loZizFke vius vk/kkj@tuvk/kkj es a ifjorZu djokuk gksxk rRi'pkr~ OTR LØhu ij Q sp dk cVu nckuk gksxk ftll s vk/kkj@tuvk/kkj esa ntZ uohu MkVk mlds OTR esa Lor% gh vk tk; sxkA vH;FkhZ dksa vius OTR es a vkj{k.k J s.kh] fnO;kaxtu J s.kh ,oa ewy fuokl esa okafNr la'kks/ku djus dh vuqefr nh xbZ gSA vH;FkhZ la'kks/ku djus ds mijkUr gh vkWuykbZu vko snu HkjsaA ;fn vH;FkhZ HkrhZ dk vkWuykbZu vkosnu lcfeV dj pqdk gS rks , slh fLFkfr esa vkWuykbZu vko snu esa la'kks/ku djus dh vof/k ds nkSjku Hkh mls Lo; a ds uke] firk ds uke] tUefrfFk ,oa fyax esa ifjorZu dh vuqefr ugha gksxhA vH;FkhZ dks ;fn vkj{k.k J s.kh@fnO;kaxtu J s.kh@ewy fuokl esa la'kks/ku djus gS rks igys mls OTR i st ij vkj{k.k J s.kh@fnO;kaxtu J s.kh@e wy fuokl esa la'kks/ku djuk gksxk bll s mls Lo; a d s vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa iwoZ es a Hkjs x; s vkj{k.k J s.kh@fnO;kaxtu J s.kh@e wy fuokl esa la'kks/ku djus dk fodYi miyC/k gks tk; sxk] ftls mi;ksx esa ysdj og okafNr la'kks/ku dj ldrk gSA vkWuykbZu vkosnu Submit fd; s tkus ds i'pkr~ ;fn vkosnd dk s fdlh izdkj dh =qfV dk irk yxrk gS rks vH;FkhZ vkWuykbZu vko snu esa QksVk s] gLrk{kj ,oa mu lwpukvksa dks ifjofrZr ugha dj ik,xk tks mlus OTR ds le; ntZ dh gS A 'ks"k lwpukvksa es a og la'kks/ku fuEukuqlkj dj ldrk gS%& i. ;fn dksbZ vH;FkhZ vius vkWuykbZu vko snu esa la'kk s/ku djkuk pkgrk gS rks vkosnu izkfIr dh v afre fnukad ds i'pkr~ 07 fnol ds Hkhrj fu/kkZfjr 'kqYd 300@& :i; s nsdj vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa la'kks/ku dj ldrk gSA vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa vH;FkhZ QksVk s] gLrk{kj ,oa mu lwpukvksa dk s ifjofrZr ugha dj ik,xk tk s mlus OTR ds le; ntZ dh gS ;Fkk uke] firk dk uk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top