SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 9994

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Vinit Kumar Mathur, Chandra Shekhar Sharma, JJ
Gameera – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 57/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Jayant Joshi, Sanjay Bishnoi
For the Respondents: C.S. Ojha, PP

A dying declaration, if voluntary and coherent, serves as a sufficient basis for conviction even without corroboration. The lack of a formal medical certificate of fitness for the declarant does not invalidate the statement if the recording authority reasonably believes the victim was in a fit mental state.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 304B - Dying declaration - Admissibility and reliability - Burden of proof - A dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it inspires the confidence of the Court and is voluntary - Presence of a doctor is not mandatory for recording, but recommended as a rule of caution - Medical opinion regarding the mental state of the declarant cannot prevail over the testimony of eyewitnesses - The degree of burns is not a decisive factor for the reliability of a dying declaration; rather, the mental state and quality of evidence are paramount. (Paras 9, 10, 11, and 12)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 161 - Investigation and trial procedure - Statements recorded during investigation do not lose credibility merely due to minor procedural issues such as the use of different pens or late submission of the First Information Report to the Magistrate - Courts must look into the core evidence to ascertain the truth of the incident. (Paras 12 and 17)

Facts of the case:
The appellant filed an appeal against the conviction and sentencing for murder. The victim, who was the wife of the appellant, sustained severe burn injuries. Following the incident, she made dying declarations to a police official in the presence of a medical officer, stating that the appellant had poured kerosene on her and set her on fire after a dispute. The appellant contended that the incident was accidental and occurred while the victim, prone to medical episodes, was cooking and accidentally caught fire. The trial court convicted the appellant for murder.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction, finding the dying declaration to be voluntary, coherent, and consistent with other evidence, including forensic reports confirming the presence of flammable petroleum hydrocarbons at the scene and the testimonies of ambulance staff who witnessed the victim identifying her husband as the perpetrator. The court rejected the appellant's version of the event, finding no evidence to support the claim of accidental death by kitchen fire.

Issues: The main issues were the reliability and admissibility of the dying declaration, whether the victim was in a fit state of mind to provide a statement despite suffering from high percentage burns, and whether the evidence sufficiently established an intentional act of murder versus an accidental occurrence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that setting a person on fire is an act of extreme cruelty amounting to murder. It reaffirmed that, as long as the court is satisfied that the declarant understood the statement and it was not tutored, a dying declaration remains a powerful piece of evidence. The absence of a specific medical certificate of fitness does not invalidate a dying declaration if the recording officer and present medical staff are satisfied with the declarant's state. The evidence provided by independent witnesses and forensic analysis corroborated the victim's statement, rendering the appellant's defence meritless.

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.

Judgment

1. Date of conclusion of arguments 18.03.2026
2. Date on which the judgment was reserved 18.03.2026
3. Whether the full judgment or only operative part is pronounced Full Judgment
4. Date of Pronouncement 27.03.2026

BY THE COURT: (Per Chandra Shekhar Sharma,J)

n.M izfØ;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 374(2) ds v/khu ;g vihy

vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] lyqEcj] ftyk

mn;iqj ds }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 22@2017( jktLFkku jkT; cuke

xehjk es a ikfjr fu.kZ; fnuk ad 15-02-2021 ds fo#) izLrqr dh gS]

ftlds }kjk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk

304&ch Hkkjrh; n aM lafgrk ds vijk/k ds vkjk si ls lansg dk ykHk nsrs

gq, nks"keqDr ?kksf"kr fd;k ,o a /kkjk 302 Hkkjrh; n aM lafgrk ds vijk/k

02- bl vihy ds fuLrkj.k gsrq izdj.k ds la{ksi es a rF; bl

izdkj gSa fd fnuk ad 29-05-2017 dk s le; 03%20 ih-,e- ij Jherh thtk

}kjk lkeqnkf;d LokLF; dsUnz] lsekjh es a byktjr jgrs gq, ,-,l-vkbZ-

eUukyky dk s e`R;qdkfyd dFku izn'kZ ih-19 bl izdkj fn, fd vkt

og ?kj ij Fkh] rHkh mldk vius ifr xehjk eh.kk ds lkFk gk syh ls i woZ

,d cPps dh ekSr gk sus dh ckr dk s ysdj >xM +k gk s x;kA rc mlds

ifr xehjk us ?kj ls dsjk slhu dk fMCck ykdj mlds Åij dsjkslhu

mMsy fn;k rFkk ekfpl ls vkx tyk nhA mldk ihgj cksjh gSA blls

T;knk mls dqN ugh a dguk gS.... bR;kfnA

03- mi;qZDr fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij iqfyl Fkkuk lsekjh es a izFke

lwpuk fjik sVZ la[;k 50@2017 i athc) dh tkdj ckn vko';d

vuqla/kku vfHk;qDr ds fo#) /kkjk 302 o 304&ch Hkkjrh; n aM lafgrk es a

vkjksi&i= U;kf;d eftLVªsV] ljkM +k ds U;k;ky; es a izLrqr fd;k]

rRi'pkr~ ;g izdj.k dfeV gksdj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; es a izkIr

gqvkA

04- fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;k/kh'k us cgl pktZ lqudj

vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk s /kkjk 302 Hkkjrh; n aM lafgrk fodYi es a /kkjk

304&ch Hkkjrh; n aM lafgrk ds vkjksi i`Fkd ls fojfpr dj lquk, o

le>k,] vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us vkjksik s a dk s lqu o le>dj vLohdkj

fd;k vkSj vUoh{kk dh ek ax dhA

05- nkSjkus vUoh{kk vkjk siks a dh iqf"V es a vfHk;k stu i{k dh vk sj

ls dqy 28 xokgku ijhf{kr gq, ,o a izys[kh; lk{; es a izn'kZ ih-01 ls

izn'kZ ih-31 nLrkost iznf'kZr gq,A vfHk;qDr dk /kkjk 313 n aM izfØ;k

lafgrk ds v/khu ijh{k.k fd;k x;k] ftles a mlus lk{; vfHk;kstu dks

xyr crkrs gq, Lo; a dk s >wBk Qalkuk dFku fd;k ,o a lk{; lQkbZ is'k

djuk pkgrs gq, dFku fd;k fd og funk sZ"k gS] mls >wBk Qalk;k x;k

gSA og ik apoh rd i< +k fy[kk gSA mlus thtk ds Åij dsjk slhu ugh a

Mkyk] u vkx yxkbZA mlus Lo; a dgk thtk ls mldh 'kknh ?kVuk ds

djhc 2&3 o"kZ i woZ gqbZ FkhA thtk dks igys Hkh Hkko vkrs FksA igys Hkh

thtk us Hkko vkrs gq, tyrk gqvk fn;k ¼nhid½ idM + fy;k FkkA mldh

lklq ek a chekj Fkh rks thtk 2-2½ o"kZ ls llqjky es a jg gh Fkh] ogk a Hkh

mlus Hkko vkrs gq, nhid dk s idM + fy;k FkkA ?kVuk ds le; og [k sr

es a FkkA mls fpYykus dh vkokt vkbZ] rk s og ?kj ij vk;kA thtk dk s

jk sVh cukrs le; Hkko vk x, blfy, pwYgs dh vkx ls mlds diM +k s a es a

vkx yx xbZ vkSj og ty xbZA mlus cq>kus dk iz;kl fd;k rk s mlds

gkFk iSj Hkh ty x,A fQj mlds firkth vkSj gketh] ykyh vkSj >weyh

vkSj eksgu vk,A ogk a ls thtk dk s vLirky ys x,A cpko i{k dh vksj

ls izfrj{kk es a dk sbZ ekSf[kd lk{; izLrqr ugh a dj nLrkosth lk{; es a

izn'kZ Mh-01 o izn'kZ Mh-02 nLrkost iznf'kZr djok,A rRi'pkr~ fo}ku

fopkj.k U;k;k/kh'k us mHk;i{kks a dh cgl lqudj mi;qZDrkuqlkj fu.kZ; o

n aMkns'k ikfjr fd;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us ;g

vihy izLrqr dh gSA

06- geus vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vk sj ls mifLFkr ;k sX;

vf/koDrk ,o a ;k sX; yksd vfHk;kstd dh cgl lquh] vk{k sfir

fu.kZ;&n.Mkns'k o vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

07- vihykFkhZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk us cgl ds nkSjku eq[; :i

ls ;g rdZ fn, fd loZizFke e`rdk Jherh thtk ds tks c;ku izn'kZ

ih-19 e`R;qdkfyd dFkuks a ds :i es a ntZ fd, x, Fk s] bu c;kuks a es a Åij

dh rhu ls pkj ykbu utnhd :i ls fy[kh gqbZ gS] blds i'pkr~ tks bZ

ls ,Q MkWDVj dk i`"Bk adu ,o a th ls ,p mlds gLrk{kj gSa] bles a Hkh

L;kgh dk varj gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mDr e`R;qdkfyd

dFkuk s a ds vk/kkj ij gh vihykFkhZ dh nk s"kflf) dk;e dh xbZ gSA

tcfd vU; lk{; ls bldh iqf"V ugh a gk s jgh FkhA vfHk;kstu i{k dh

vksj ls gh is'k fd, x, xokgku Øe'k% ih-MCY;q-04 gke

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top