SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10024

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP / 1926 / 2023



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:14502]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1926/2023

Vijay Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Shiv Charan Gupta, Aged About 39 Years, B/c Gupta R/o Vill. Kota Mamchari Tehsil Karauli Dist. Karauli Raj. Senior Section Officer (Accounts) In The Office Of Senior Assistant Finance Advisor-Workshop Norht Western Railway Jodhpur At Present Senior Section Officer (Accounts) In The Office Of Senior Assistant Finance Advisor-Workshop And Store North Western Railway Bikaner House No. 14/403 Mukta

Prasad Nagar In Front Of Lal Bahadur Shastri Park Bikaner ----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Dheeraj Panwar S/o Shri Labhchand Panwar, R/o House No. 76 Lane No. 3 Chankya Nagar Lal Sagar Road Jodhpur

Dist. Jodhpur Raj.

----Respondents Connected With

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 275/2024 Sanjay Meena S/o Raju Lal Meena, Aged About 39 Years, B/c Meena R/o House No. A-90 Rajeev Gandhi Nagar Jagatpura Jaipur (Rajasthan) Senior Section Engineer Electric (R.e) Office Additional Chief Electric Engineer Railway Electrification Jodhpur.

At Present Senior Section Engineer Electrical (R.e) Jalore.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Bhawani Singh S/o Samudra Singh, B/c Rajput House No.

C-107 Sainik Colony Sardulpur Rajgarh District Churu.

Representative Of M/s D.k Enterprises ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU

Order

27/03/2026

The present criminal misc. petitions have been filed by the

petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 07.09.2022 and 22.06.2022 passed by learned Special Judge (Anti

(Uploaded on 02/04/2026 at 07:33:43 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 11:45:28 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:14502] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1926/2023] Corruption Cases) No.1 Jodhpur whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioners in criminal original case No.41/2022 and 26/2022 respectively for offences under Section 7 of

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The main contention raised in the present revision petition,

challenging the charges framed by the learned trial Court against the petitioners, is that for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act allegedly committed by persons who are serving in the Central Government within the territorial jurisdiction of State Agencies, the ACB has no jurisdiction to register the criminal case and to proceed with the investigation and file charge-sheet, and the same comes within the jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of

Investigation.

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the core question

involved in this case was considered by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in bunch of petitions which was led by CRLMP No.2819/2025 titled as Mukesh Singh vs. State of Rajasthan. Both the parties, does not dispute the fact that the question involved in the petition is no res integra and has been decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.09.2025. Further the said judgment was challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court and the same has been affirmed in SLP Nos.1104-1108/2026 vide order dated 27.01.2026. In view of the same, the main contention raised by the petitioner does not

survive.

In view of the same, petitioners does not want to press the

present criminal misc. petition at this stage. However, seeks

(Uploaded on 02/04/2026 at 07:33:43 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 11:45:28 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:14502] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1926/2023] liberty to raise all his contentions before the concerned trial Court

as and when occasion so arises

Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed

as not pressed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to raise all their contentions before the concerned trial Court at appropriate

stage if occasion so arises.

(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J

216-219---Jatin/-

(Uploaded on 02/04/2026 at 07:33:43 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 11:45:28 AM)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top