SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10049

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MUNNURI LAXMAN
ASHOK KUMAR SHROTRIYA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 13306 / 2025



[2026:RJ-JD:13956]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17422/2025 Dharmendra Kumar Jatav S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 62 Years, Resident of Ambe Vihar, B K Kaulnagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Education (Secondary, Primary and Language), Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The State of Rajasthan, through the Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13306/2025 Ashok Kumar Shrotriya S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 64 Years, Resident of E-479/80, Shivaji Marg, Pathik Nagar,bhilwara- 311001.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Education (Secondary, Primary and Language), Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18131/2025 Kesar Singh Chouhan S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 74 Years, Resident of C/o K P Chouhan, Mangal Colony, Gandhi Nagar, Ajmer Road, Beawar, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Education (Secondary, Primary and Language), Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The State of Rajasthan, through the Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18751/2025 Rajendra Prakash Mathur S/o Bheru Lal Mathur, Aged About 68 Years, Resident of Vashali Nagar, Near Dali Bai Circle, Chopasani, Jodhpur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Education (Secondary, Primary and Language), Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The State of Rajasthan, through the Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Kshamendra Mathur, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhupesh Charan on behalf of Mr. N.K. Mehta, Govt. Counsel HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN

Order

Order Reserved on : 28/01/2026 Order Pronounced on : 27/03/2026

1) The present writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking directions to the respondents to fix their pay scale and grade pay in the cadre of Principal for the period they were appointed on a temporary officiating basis i.e. “Patey Vetan” on 11.08.2007, 01.10.2007, 08.10.2003, and 26.10.2009, respectively. They have also sought directions for the payment of arrears and for the revision of their pension accordingly.

2) For the sake of brevity, the facts stated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17422/2025 (Dharmendra Kumar Jatav Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.) are referred to hereinafter for the disposal of all the aforementioned writ petitions. The case of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Head Master, Government Secondary School on 21.02.1995. By order dated 04.08.2007, he was appointed on a temporary officiating basis to the post of Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, with the condition that he would continue to draw the pay scale of his substantive post. Subsequently, a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) was convened in 2013 for promotions against vacancies for the year 2007–2008. Pursuant to the DPC’s recommendation, the petitioner was reappointed to the same post that he had been holding on a temporary officiating basis (“Patey Vetan”). The petitioner re- joined on the said post on 13.05.2013. Thereafter, the petitioner retired without his pay being fixed in the higher pay scale of the post of Principal for the period of temporary officiation and without being granted continuity of service for that purpose.

3) The issue involved in all these writ petitions is whether the petitioners, who were directed to hold the higher post of Principal, Government Senior Secondary School on a temporary officiating basis (i.e., “Patey Vetan”) with the condition that they would be entitled only to the pay scale of their substantive post, are nevertheless entitled to the pay-scal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top