##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:14234]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6527/2026

Madi Devi W/o Shri Narayan Lal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Deshwal, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur (Raj).

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Horticulture, Government Of Rajasthan,

Jaipur (Raj).

2. The Commissioner (Horticulture), Commissionerate, Government Of Rajathan, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jaipur

(Raj).

3. The District Collector And Chairman, Horticulture Development Society, District Nagaur (Raj).

4. The Additional Director (Horticulture), Horticulture Commissionerate, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj).

5. The Chief Accounts Officer (Horticulture), Horticulture Commissionerate, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj).

6. The Joint Director (Horticulture), Horticulture Commissionerate, Jaipur (Raj).

7. The Deputy Director (Horticulture), District Nagaur (Raj).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. OP Sangwa Mr. Bheru lal Jat

Mr. Dinesh Kashniya For Respondent(s) : --

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

27/03/2026

By way of filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the

following reliefs:

(Uploaded on 27/03/2026 at 06:13:31 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:42:09 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:14234] (2 of 3) [CW-6527/2026]

“It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed and

by an appropriate writ, order or direction:

(i) the impugned order dated 25.11.2025 (Annexure-3) to the extent it mentions the total cost as Rs.26,91,986/-, subsidy (Dey Anudan) Rs. 16,59,840/-, as and petitioner's contribution as Rs. 10,32,146/-, may kindly be quashed and

set aside, qua the petitioner (ii) the respondents may kindly be directed to forthwith revise (the administrative approval order dated 25.11.2025- Annex.3 qua the petitioner) and accordingly reissue the administrative approval order in favour of the petitioner, calculating the Rs.19,19,424/- based on the rate of Rs.769/- per total cost at square meter as per the guidelines dated 04.06.2020 (Annexure-4), and granting 95% subsidy amounting to Rs. 18,23,453/ with the petitioner's contribution as Rs.95,971/-, in accordance with the Guidelines/Instructions (2023-2024) for the Mission for

Integrated Development of Horticulture (Annexure-5).

(iii) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit, just and proper, by which the petitioner may get complete justice

may also kindly be passed.

(iv) Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with exemplary costs..”

2. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if the competent authority of the respondent - department is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 14.12.2025 and 07.02.2026 submitted by the petitioner seeking 95% subsidy for construction of Poly House in accordance with law

as expeditiously as possible.

3. In view of the aforesaid limited submission made at Bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the respondent – department to consider and decide the representations dated 14.12.2025 and 07.02.2026 submitted by the petitioner seeking 95% subsidy for construction of Poly House as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from today keeping in view the applicable review guidelines

in accordance with law.

(Uploaded on 27/03/2026 at 06:13:31 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:42:09 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:14234] (3 of 3) [CW-6527/2026] 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representations has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievances and the same may not be construed to an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5. Stay petition also stands dispos